Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19838657›Full record

ArticleDer Internist2009

[Vasculitis and hereditary small vessel diseases].

C Opherk, N Peters, M Dichgans

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Internist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Presymptomatic genetic testing in CADASIL.Journal of neurology · 2012
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

C OpherkInstitut für Schlaganfall- und Demenzforschung, Neurologische Klinik und Poliklinik, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität, Marchioninistrasse 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
N Peters
M Dichgans

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In younger patients with stroke, cerebral vasculitis and hereditary small vessel diseases should be considered as important differential diagnoses. Since the clinical course of cerebral vasculitis is highly variable, diagnostic workup, which includes laboratory tests, CSF analysis, cranial magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy, is often challenging. Therapy should be initiated on an interdisciplinary basis and includes immunosuppressive induction and maintenance regimes. Hereditary small vessel diseases, e.g. CADASIL or Fabry's disease, can mimic clinical features of cerebral vasculitis. Their diagnosis which is based on family history, typical clinical features and genetic analysis often has implications for treatment and genetic counselling.

Indexed as

HumansPeripheral Vascular DiseasesStrokeVasculitis, Central Nervous System

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.