Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19837718›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2009

NAViGaTOR: Network Analysis, Visualization and Graphing Toronto.

Kevin R Brown, David Otasek, Muhammad Ali, Michael J McGuffin, Wing Xie, Baiju Devani, Ian Lawson van Toch, Igor Jurisica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
136citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

136 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Harnessing network pharmacology in drug discovery: an integrated approach.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. BioPAX in 2024: Where we are and where we are heading.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin R BrownDivision of Signaling Biology, Ontario Cancer Institute and University Health Network, Toronto, ON.
David Otasek
Muhammad Ali
Michael J McGuffin
Wing Xie
Baiju Devani
Ian Lawson van Toch
Igor Jurisica

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryNAViGaTOR is a powerful graphing application for the 2D and 3D visualization of biological networks. NAViGaTOR includes a rich suite of visual mark-up tools for manual and automated annotation, fast and scalable layout algorithms and OpenGL hardware acceleration to facilitate the visualization of large graphs. Publication-quality images can be rendered through SVG graphics export. NAViGaTOR supports community-developed data formats (PSI-XML, BioPax and GML), is platform-independent and is extensible through a plug-in architecture. AVAILABILITY: NAViGaTOR is freely available to the research community from http://ophid.utoronto.ca/navigator/. Installers and documentation are provided for 32- and 64-bit Windows, Mac, Linux and Unix. CONTACT: juris@ai.utoronto.ca SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsSoftwareComputational BiologyDatabase Management SystemsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID19837718
PMCPMC2788933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.