Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19837290›Full record

ReviewVaccine2009

Influenza vaccines.

A H Ellebedy, R J Webby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Induction of broadly cross-reactive antibody responses to the influenza HA stem region following H5N1 vaccination in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mucosal Vaccination for Influenza Protection Enhanced by Catalytic Immune-Adjuvant.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Adjuvanted H5N1 influenza vaccine enhances both cross-reactive memory B cell and strain-specific naive B cell responses in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A H EllebedyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN 38105-3678, USA. Richard.webby@stjude.org
R J Webby

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200700005C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Influenza A viruses pose a substantial threat to the human population whether by purposeful manipulation and release or by the natural process of interspecies transmissions from animal reservoirs. The challenge with preparing for these events with vaccination strategies is that the best forms of protective immunity target the most variable of the viral proteins, hemagglutinin. Add to this even just the natural extent of variation in this protein and the challenges to vaccinologists become great. Progress must be made in the area of streamlining the conventional vaccine approaches, but also in further defining and testing more conserved protective antigens. Within the context of biodefense, the issue will be to reach a balance where some of the diversity of influenza viruses can be encompassed within a vaccine while maintaining an acceptable level of efficacy.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAVaccines, InactivatedAdjuvants, ImmunologicHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID19837290
PMCPMC2900784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.