Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19837029›Full record

ReviewCell2009

Common sense about taste: from mammals to insects.

David A Yarmolinsky, Charles S Zuker, Nicholas J P Ryba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 378 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
378citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

378 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Molecular and Cellular Mechanism for Bitter Taste in the mosquitobioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Connectomic mapping of pharyngeal and gut sensory circuits in adultbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Stress-induced preference for antioxidants byProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

318 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David A YarmolinskyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Charles S Zuker
Nicholas J P Ryba

Funding

Taste And SmellZIADE000561 · NIDCR · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH · PI RYBA, NICHOLAS J · 2009 to 2025
$26.2M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteIntramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sense of taste is a specialized chemosensory system dedicated to the evaluation of food and drink. Despite the fact that vertebrates and insects have independently evolved distinct anatomic and molecular pathways for taste sensation, there are clear parallels in the organization and coding logic between the two systems. There is now persuasive evidence that tastant quality is mediated by labeled lines, whereby distinct and strictly segregated populations of taste receptor cells encode each of the taste qualities.

Indexed as

TasteAnimalsChemoreceptor CellsInsectaMammalsTaste BudsTongue

Identifiers

PMID19837029
PMCPMC3936514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.