Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19837019›Full record

ReviewAcademic pediatrics

An examination of the advances in science and technology of prevention of tooth decay in young children since the Surgeon General's Report on Oral Health.

Peter Milgrom, Domenick T Zero, Jason M Tanzer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A concise synthesis of carolacton.Organic letters · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter MilgromNorthwest Center to Reduce Oral Health Disparities, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-7475, USA. dfrc@u.washington.edu
Domenick T Zero
Jason M Tanzer
Northwest University · USUConn Health · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

XYLITOL CLINCIAL STUDIES FOR CARIES PREVENTIONU54DE014254 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KING, GREGORY JOSEPH · 2001 to 2007
$9.6M
Statistics and Data Coordinating CenterU54DE019346 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MANCL, LLOYD A · 2008 to 2012
$6.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE014254NIDCR NIH HHS U54 DE019346NIDCR NIH HHS U54DE019346NIDCR NIH HHS U54DE14254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper addresses a number of areas related to how effectively science and technology have met Healthy People 2010 goals for tooth decay prevention. In every area mentioned, it appears that science and technology are falling short of these goals. Earlier assessments identified water fluoridation as one of the greatest public health accomplishments of the last century. Yet, failure to complete needed clinical and translational research has shortchanged the caries prevention agenda at a critical juncture. Science has firmly established the transmissible nature of tooth decay. However, there is evidence that tooth decay in young children is increasing, although progress has been made in other age groups. Studies of risk assessment have not been translated into improved practice. Antiseptics, chlorhexidine varnish, and polyvinylpyrrolidone iodine (PVI-I) may have value, but definitive trials are needed. Fluorides remain the most effective agents, but are not widely disseminated to the most needy. Fluoride varnish provides a relatively effective topical preventive for very young children, yet definitive trials have not been conducted. Silver diamine fluoride also has potential but requires study in the United States. Data support effectiveness and safety of xylitol, but adoption is not widespread. Dental sealants remain a mainstay of public policy, yet after decades of research, widespread use has not occurred. We conclude that research has established the public health burden of tooth decay, but insufficient research addresses the problems identified in the report Oral Health in America: A Report of the Surgeon General. Transfer of technology from studies to implementation is needed to prevent tooth decay among children. This should involve translational research and implementation of scientific and technological advances into practice.

Indexed as

Oral HealthChildChild, PreschoolDental Care for ChildrenDental CariesFemaleHealthy People ProgramsHumansMalePediatric DentistryRisk AssessmentTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited States

Identifiers

PMID19837019
PMCPMC2787840
OpenAlexW2017888891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.