ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2010
Distinction and quantitation of sugar isomers in ternary mixtures using the kinetic method.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry approach for characterizing sucrose isomers in complex mono-floral honey.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Distinguishing Oligosaccharide Isomers Using Far-Infrared Ion Spectroscopy: Identification of Biomarkers for Inborn Errors of Metabolism.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Development of a Post-Column Liquid Chromatographic Chiral Addition Method for the Separation and Resolution of Common Mammalian Monosaccharides.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Identifying the D-Pentoses Using Water Adduction to Lithium Cationized Molecule.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2017Article
- Complete hexose isomer identification with mass spectrometry.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2015Article
- Estimation of ion competition via correlated responsivity offset in linear ion trap mass spectrometry analysis: theory and practical use in the analysis of cyanobacterial hepatotoxin microcystin-LR in extracts of food additives.BioMed research international · 2013Article
- Isomeric distinction of small oligosaccharides: a bottom-up approach using the kinetic method.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative isomeric analysis of fructose, galactose, and glucose was achieved using electrospray ionization and trimeric ion dissociation with data analysis by the kinetic method. Several L-amino acids and divalent metal cations were tested to select the best systems for isomeric distinction and quantitation of each monosaccharide. High discrimination could be achieved for most tested systems, and serine/Cu(2+) and aspartic acid/Mn(2+) were selected for quantitative analysis due to their ability to strongly distinguish the three analytes and to allow long-term reproducible measuring conditions. Accurate quantitative results were obtained for all isomers using three-point corrected calibration curves, which account for the competition effects evidenced to occur between sugars for the formation of the trimeric complexes. As a result, the relative proportion of one isomer in the liquid and in the gas phase depends on the sugar mixture composition. However, for a given reference/metal system, the extent of competition effects was shown to be constant within a given pair of sugars. The correction factors could thus be established based on data obtained from binary mixtures and successfully used for ternary sample analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19836261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.