Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19835581›Full record

ArticleTrials2009

Common definition for categories of clinical research: a prerequisite for a survey on regulatory requirements by the European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN).

Christine Kubiak, Fernando de Andres-Trelles, Wolfgang Kuchinke, Karl-Heinz Huemer, Steffen Thirstrup, Kate Whitfield, Christian Libersa, Béatrice Barraud, Xina Grählert, Gabriele Dreier and 18 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Christine KubiakInstitut Thématique Santé Publique, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm), Paris, France. christine.kubiak@inserm.fr
Fernando de Andres-Trelles
Wolfgang Kuchinke
Karl-Heinz Huemer
Steffen Thirstrup
Kate Whitfield
Christian Libersa
Béatrice Barraud
Xina Grählert
Gabriele Dreier
Ruth Grychtol
Zsuzsa Temesvari
Gyorgy Blasko
Gabriella Kardos
Timothy O'Brien
Margaret Cooney
Siobhan Gaynor
Arrigo Schieppati
Nuria Sanz
Raquel Hernandez
Charlotte Asker-Hagelberg
Hanna Johansson
Sue Bourne
Jane Byrne
Adeeba Asghar
Jean-Marc Husson
Christian Gluud
Jacques Demotes-Mainard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThorough knowledge of the regulatory requirements is a challenging prerequisite for conducting multinational clinical studies in Europe given their complexity and heterogeneity in regulation and perception across the EU member states.

methodsIn order to summarise the current situation in relation to the wide spectrum of clinical research, the European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) developed a multinational survey in ten European countries. However a lack of common classification framework for major categories of clinical research was identified, and therefore reaching an agreement on a common classification was the initial step in the development of the survey.

resultsThe ECRIN transnational working group on regulation, composed of experts in the field of clinical research from ten European countries, defined seven major categories of clinical research that seem relevant from both the regulatory and the scientific points of view, and correspond to congruent definitions in all countries: clinical trials on medicinal products; clinical trials on medical devices; other therapeutic trials (including surgery trials, transplantation trials, transfusion trials, trials with cell therapy, etc.); diagnostic studies; clinical research on nutrition; other interventional clinical research (including trials in complementary and alternative medicine, trials with collection of blood or tissue samples, physiology studies, etc.); and epidemiology studies. Our classification was essential to develop a survey focused on protocol submission to ethics committees and competent authorities, procedures for amendments, requirements for sponsor and insurance, and adverse event reporting following five main phases: drafting, consensus, data collection, validation, and finalising.

conclusionThe list of clinical research categories as used for the survey could serve as a contribution to the, much needed, task of harmonisation and simplification of the regulatory requirements for clinical research in Europe.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicData CollectionEuropeHumans

Identifiers

PMID19835581
PMCPMC2768680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.