Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19834567›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2009

Integrating diverse information to gain more insight into microarray analysis.

Raja Loganantharaj, Jun Chung

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raja LoganantharajBioinformatics Research Lab, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504, USA. logan@cacs.louisiana.edu
Jun Chung
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport · USUniversity of Louisiana at Lafayette · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microarray technology provides an opportunity to view transcriptions at genomic level under different conditions controlled by an experiment. From an array experiment using a human cancer cell line that is engineered to differ in expression of tumor antigen, integrin alpha6beta4, few hundreds of differentially expressed genes are selected and are clustered using one of several standard algorithms. The set of genes in a cluster is expected to have similar expression patterns and are most likely to be coregulated and thereby expected to have similar function. The highly expressed set of upregulated genes become candidates for further evaluation as potential biomarkers. Besides these benefits, microarray experiment by itself does not help us to understand or discover potential pathways or to identify important set of genes for potential drug targets. In this paper we discuss about integrating protein-to-protein interaction information, pathway information with array expression data set to identify a set of "important" genes, and potential signal transduction networks that help to target and reverse the oncogenic phenotype induced by tumor antigen such as integrin alpha6beta4. We will illustrate the proposed method with our recent microarray experiment conducted for identifying transcriptional targets of integrin alpha6beta4 for cancer progression.

Indexed as

Microarray AnalysisAlgorithmsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCluster AnalysisFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansIntegrin alpha6beta4Oligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProteomeSignal TransductionIntegrin alpha6beta4Proteome

Identifiers

PMID19834567
PMCPMC2761008
OpenAlexW2094434980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.