Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19834481›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2009

Explaining microbial population genomics through phage predation.

Francisco Rodriguez-Valera, Ana-Belen Martin-Cuadrado, Beltran Rodriguez-Brito, Lejla Pasić, T Frede Thingstad, Forest Rohwer, Alex Mira

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 367 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
367citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

367 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Remodelling of the gut virome after long-term fasting.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. An N4-likeJournal of bacteriology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Zoetrope effect in phage evolution.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

307 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francisco Rodriguez-ValeraDepartmento de Producción Vegetal y Microbiología, Universidad Miguel Hernandez, San Juan de Alicante, Spain.
Ana-Belen Martin-Cuadrado
Beltran Rodriguez-Brito
Lejla Pasić
T Frede Thingstad
Forest Rohwer
Alex Mira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The remarkable differences that have been detected by metagenomics in the genomes of strains of the same bacterial species are difficult to reconcile with the widely accepted paradigm that periodic selection within bacterial populations will regularly purge genomic diversity by clonal replacement. We have found that many of the genes that differ between strains affect regions that are potential phage recognition targets. We therefore propose the constant-diversity dynamics model, in which the diversity of prokaryotic populations is preserved by phage predation. We provide supporting evidence for this model from metagenomics, mathematical analysis and computer simulations. Periodic selection and phage predation dynamics are not mutually exclusive; we compare their predictions to shed light on the ecological circumstances under which each type of dynamics could predominate.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsPopulation DynamicsBacteriaBacteriophagesComputational BiologyModels, BiologicalSelection, GeneticSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID19834481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.