Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19833247›Full record

ArticleVaccine2009

Molecular smallpox vaccine delivered by alphavirus replicons elicits protective immunity in mice and non-human primates.

Jay W Hooper, Anthony M Ferro, Joseph W Golden, Peter Silvera, Jeanne Dudek, Kim Alterson, Max Custer, Bryan Rivers, John Morris, Gary Owens and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Design and Optimization of aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Defending against smallpox: a focus on vaccines.Expert review of vaccines · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jay W HooperUS Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Virology Division, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, MD 21702, United States. jay.hooper@amedd.army.mil
Anthony M Ferro
Joseph W Golden
Peter Silvera
Jeanne Dudek
Kim Alterson
Max Custer
Bryan Rivers
John Morris
Gary Owens
Jonathan F Smith
Kurt I Kamrud
Research Triangle Park Foundation · USUnited States Department of the Army · USSouthern Research Institute · USThermo Fisher Scientific (Norway) · NOUnited States Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Development of an VEE Replicon Vaccine Against SmallpoxUC1AI067183 · NIAID · ALPHAVAX HUMAN VACCINES, INC. · PI KAMRUD, KURT I · 2005 to 2005
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS 1UC1-AI067183-02NIAID NIH HHS 5-UC1-AI067183-02NIAID NIH HHS UC1 AI067183NIAID NIH HHS Y1-AI-2663-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturally occurring smallpox was eradicated as a result of successful vaccination campaigns during the 1960s and 1970s. Because of its highly contagious nature and high mortality rate, smallpox has significant potential as a biological weapon. Unfortunately, the current vaccine for orthopoxviruses is contraindicated for large portions of the population. Thus, there is a need for new, safe, and effective orthopoxvirus vaccines. Alphavirus replicon vectors, derived from strains of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, are being used to develop alternatives to the current smallpox vaccine. Here, we demonstrated that virus-like replicon particles (VRPs) expressing the vaccinia virus A33R, B5R, A27L, and L1R genes elicited protective immunity in mice comparable to vaccination with live-vaccinia virus. Furthermore, cynomolgus macaques vaccinated with a combination of the four poxvirus VRPs (4pox-VRP) developed antibody responses to each antigen. These antibody responses were able to neutralize and inhibit the spread of both vaccinia virus and monkeypox virus. Macaques vaccinated with 4pox-VRP, flu HA VRP (negative control), or live-vaccinia virus (positive control) were challenged intravenously with 5 x 10(6)pfu of monkeypox virus 1 month after the second VRP vaccination. Four of the six negative control animals succumbed to monkeypox and the remaining two animals demonstrated either severe or grave disease. Importantly, all 10 macaques vaccinated with the 4pox-VRP vaccine survived without developing severe disease. These findings revealed that a single-boost VRP smallpox vaccine shows promise as a safe alternative to the currently licensed live-vaccinia virus smallpox vaccine.

Indexed as

AlphavirusAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingChlorocebus aethiopsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleMacacaMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPolymerase Chain ReactionSmallpox VaccineVero CellsAntibodies, NeutralizingSmallpox Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID19833247
PMCPMC2789203
OpenAlexW2011145289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.