ArticleDeveloping world bioethics2010
Research integrity in China: problems and prospects.
Article in Developing world bioethics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Pooled it
- Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys.Science and engineering ethics · 2015Pooled it
- A low-cost approach to high quality responsible conduct of research education.International journal of ethics education · 2026Article
- Perceptions of Pharmacy Graduate Students Toward Research Ethics Education: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Developing Country.Science and engineering ethics · 2022Article
- Ethical Perspectives of Chinese and United States Physicians at Initiation of a Research Collaborative.Accountability in research · 2022Article
- Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics (RIRE).Scientometrics · 2022Article
- Taiwanese Researchers' Perceptions of Questionable Authorship Practices: An Exploratory Study.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing.Science and engineering ethics · 2020Article
- A comprehensive review of Hep-2 cell line in translational research for laryngeal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2019Review
- The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.Current sociology. La Sociologie contemporaine · 2017Review
- A Comparison of the Effects of Ethics Training on International and US Students.Science and engineering ethics · 2016Article
- Should we search Chinese biomedical databases when performing systematic reviews?Systematic reviews · 2015Article
- Medical research misconduct need regulatory reforms.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2014Article
- Research misconduct in low- and middle-income countries.PLoS medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In little more than 30 years, China has recovered from the intellectual stagnation brought about by the Cultural Revolution to become a global leader in science and technology. Like other leading countries in science and technology, China has encountered some ethical problems related to the conduct of research. China's leaders have taken some steps to respond to these problems, such as developing ethics policies and establishing oversight committees. To keep moving forward, China needs to continue to take effective action to promote research integrity. Some of the challenges China faces include additional policy development, promoting education in responsible conduct of research, protecting whistle-blowers, and cultivating an ethical research environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.