ArticleClinical science (London, England : 1979)2010
Central and cerebrovascular effects of leg crossing in humans with sympathetic failure.
Article in Clinical science (London, England : 1979), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exaggerated postural sway improves orthostatic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular control.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Counter pressure maneuvers for syncope prevention: A semi-systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Central Hypovolemia Detection During Environmental Stress-A Role for Artificial Intelligence?Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Timing of Circulatory and Neurological Events in Syncope.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
- Transcranial Doppler in autonomic testing: standards and clinical applications.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2018Review
- "The beach position": crossed legs as a marker for a favourable clinical course in neurological intensive care unit patients.Intensive care medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leg crossing increases arterial pressure and combats symptomatic orthostatic hypotension in patients with sympathetic failure. This study compared the central and cerebrovascular effects of leg crossing in patients with sympathetic failure and healthy controls. We addressed the relationship between MCA Vmean (middle cerebral artery blood velocity; using transcranial Doppler ultrasound), frontal lobe oxygenation [O2Hb (oxyhaemoglobin)] and MAP (mean arterial pressure), CO (cardiac output) and TPR (total peripheral resistance) in six patients (aged 37-67 years; three women) and age- and gender-matched controls during leg crossing. In the patients, leg crossing increased MAP from 58 (42-79) to 72 (52-89) compared with 84 (70-95) to 90 (74-94) mmHg in the controls. MCA Vmean increased from 55 (38-77) to 63 (45-80) and from 56 (46-77) to 64 (46-80) cm/s respectively (P<0.05), with a larger rise in O2Hb [1.12 (0.52-3.27)] in the patients compared with the controls [0.83 (-0.11 to 2.04) micromol/l]. In the control subjects, CO increased 11% (P<0.05) with no change in TPR. By contrast, in the patients, CO increased 9% (P<0.05), but also TPR increased by 13% (P<0.05). In conclusion, leg crossing improves cerebral perfusion and oxygenation both in patients with sympathetic failure and in healthy subjects. However, in healthy subjects, cerebral perfusion and oxygenation were improved by a rise in CO without significant changes in TPR or MAP, whereas in patients with sympathetic failure, cerebral perfusion and oxygenation were improved through a rise in MAP due to increments in both CO and TPR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.