ArticleNeuroscience and behavioral physiology2009
The course and outcomes of episodic endogenous psychoses with juvenile onset (a follow-up study).
Article in Neuroscience and behavioral physiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical Recovery Among Individuals With a First-Episode Schizophrenia an Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2023Pooled it
- Patterns of illness and care over the 5 years following onset of psychosis in different ethnic groups; the GAP-5 study.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A clinical follow-up study (mean follow-up period 16.8 +/- 6.4 years) of 278 patients with juvenile-onset endogenous episodic psychosis (Endogenous Psychosis Episodic Type, EPET -- ICD-10 F20.03, F20.23, F25) with first episodes in 1984-1995 was performed. The period of the most intense occurrence of repeated episodes occurred during the first five years from the initial episode (almost all repeat episodes in the patients occurred during this period). At the time of the follow-up study, "good" outcomes were seen in 18.7% of patients, "relatively good" in 33.8%, "relatively poor" in 30.2%, and "poor" in 17.2%. Analysis of correlations between disease course and outcome and types of manifest episode and a number of clinical-pathogenetic parameters yielded several statistically significant criteria for clinical and social prognosis. Nosological evaluation at the time of the follow-up study showed that 76.2% of patients had schizophrenia (episodic progressive in 61.1%, recurrent in 15.1%) and 28.3% had schizoaffective psychosis. Comparison of the data with results from previous analogous studies led to the conclusion that the contemporary pathomorphosis of EPET is more favorable, with trends to improvements in disease course and outcome, decreases in progression, and significant reductions in cases of transition to a chronic course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19830572What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.