ArticleNeurotoxicity research2010
Targeting cholinesterase inhibitor poisoning with a novel blocker against both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors.
Article in Neurotoxicity research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinicians have been treating poisoning by acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) for more than half a century. However, the current atropine-centered therapy still cannot protect completely against all ChEIs, and poisoning by ChEIs is fatal in more than 20% of cases. Various solutions that try to enhance atropine's antimuscarinic effects have been used, but these fail to increase the antidotal effect, and their too potent muscarinic antagonism may produce incapacitating side effects. We hypothesized that, in the treatment of ChEI poisoning, the high death rate may not be attributed to the insufficient muscarinic antagonism but to the lack of nicotinic antagonism. To test this hypothesis, we designed and synthesized benthiactzine, a drug that blocks both muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs). A specific [(3)H]quinuclidinyl benzilate-binding assay showed that benthiactzine was much weaker than atropine in binding to five different mAChR subtypes or to mAChRs expressed in 14 different tissues. Electrophysiological measures were used to identify and characterize benthiactzine's antinicotinic effect on three typical neuronal nAChRs subtypes, alpha4beta2, alpha4beta4, and alpha7, which are expressed heterogenously in SH-EP1 cells. Finally, benthiactzine afforded better protection than atropine against the most lethal ChEI, VX or sarin, in a mouse model. These results indicate that the antidotal effect may not be directly related to the antidote's antimuscarinic effect and that the antinicotinic effect may provide additional protection against ChEI poisoning. This new drug may benefit future antidote discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.