Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19830407›Full record

SynthesisPsychopharmacology2009

Light and intermittent cigarette smokers: a review (1989-2009).

Chris R E Coggins, E Lenn Murrelle, Richard A Carchman, Christian Heidbreder

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychopharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Neural correlates of performance monitoring in daily and intermittent smokers.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2014
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Determinants of Light and Intermittent Smoking in the United States: Results from Three Pooled National Health Surveys.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2017
    Article
  18. Nondaily, Low-Rate Daily, and High-Rate Daily Smoking in Young Adults: A 17-Year Follow-Up.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Development and psychometric properties of the Smoking Restraint Questionnaire.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chris R E CogginsCarson Watts Consulting, King, NC 27021, USA.
E Lenn Murrelle
Richard A Carchman
Christian Heidbreder
Altran (France) · FRAltria (United States) · USVirginia BioTechnology Research Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleGrowing proportions of smokers in the USA do not smoke everyday and can be referred to as light and intermittent smokers (LITS). Despite a current prevalence of LITS in the USA estimated at 25-33% of all smokers, a systematic review of the literature on this group of smokers has yet to be written.

objectivesThe aim of this paper is to review and evaluate research on LITS and to identify, describe and discuss commonalities and differences between LITS and daily smokers.

methodsThe primary databases used to search for publications were Pub Med (National Library of Medicine) and SCOPUS (Elsevier).

resultsLITS inhale smoke and have post-smoking blood nicotine concentrations that are broadly equivalent to those found in daily smokers. However, LITS differ from daily smokers with regard to cigarette consumption and frequency of cigarette use, sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics, motives, personality traits, dependence, withdrawal and craving, response to smoking-related cues, quitting perception, past-smoking status, and initiation.

conclusionsIn contrast to daily smokers, LITS show few or no signs of dependence as currently defined by DSM-IV criteria, appear to exercise more self-control, seem to be less impulsive, and their smoking experience is primarily associated with positive rather than negative reinforcement. Conclusions drawn from the reviewed literature highlight the multivariate factors that must be taken into account when defining LITS and emphasize the importance of further research on this increasing fraction of smokers. The potential implications of increased LITS prevalence on smoking-related disease risks remain to be thoroughly investigated.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveHealth SurveysHumansNicotineSmokingSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTobacco Use DisorderNicotine

Identifiers

PMID19830407
OpenAlexW1969226443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.