ArticleClinical rheumatology2010
Significance of anti-CCP antibodies in modification of 1987 ACR classification criteria in diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-field magnetic resonance imaging or combined ultrasonography and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody improve correct classification of individuals as established rheumatoid arthritis: results of a population-based, cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2014Article
- Early diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: an introduction to the newly designed Iran Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology international · 2013Article
- Circulating and synovial antibody profiling of juvenile arthritis patients by nucleic acid programmable protein arrays.Arthritis research & therapy · 2012Article
- Correlation of anti-cyclic citrullinated antibody with hand joint erosion score in rheumatoid arthritis patients.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine the incorporation of anti-CCP antibodies into the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to evaluate the advantages of the revised anti-CCP criteria in diagnosing Chinese patients. Patients who suffered from arthritic problems during the recent 2 years were selected from the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Peking University People's Hospital. The patients were divided into RA group and non-RA group according to the clinical diagnosis by experienced rheumatologists. The ACR criteria were revised in three ways: (1) replacement of rheumatoid nodules and erosions as criteria with anti-CCP antibodies (RA-6 criteria); (2) replacement of rheumatoid nodules with anti-CCP antibodies as a criterion (RA-7 criteria); (3) addition of anti-CCP antibodies (RA-8 criteria). The diagnostic value of ACR criteria and anti-CCP revised criteria (RA-6, RA-7, and RA-8) were evaluated by comparing the sensitivity and specificity of all criteria, in all subjects and in subjects with arthritis symptoms within 2 years. There were 604 patients included in the study totally, among whom 312 patients were diagnosed as RA and 292 were diagnosed as other rheumatic diseases by rheumatologists. For all the RA patients, the sensitivity and specificity of anti-CCP antibodies were 76.2% and 96%, respectively. Its specificity was much higher than RF (85.2%). For the patients with a disease duration less than two years, the sensitivities were 82.0%, 91.0%, 87.0%, and 87.0%, while the specificities were 95.6%, 83.9%, 95.6%, and 95.6%, respectively, according to 1987 ACR criteria, RA-6, RA-7, and RA-8 criteria. Among all the RA patients, the corresponding sensitivities were 92.3%, 96.8%, 94.6%, and 94.6%, and the specificities were 92.8%, 83.6%, 92.8%, and 92.8%, respectively. The 1987 ACR criteria have high sensitivity and specificity in established RA, but are less sensitive in early RA. The RA-6 criteria improve the sensitivity by reducing its specificity. The RA-7 criteria with replacement of rheumatoid nodules by anti-CCP antibodies increase the sensitivity without losing specificity, which may serve as new classification criteria in routine clinical practice, especially in early RA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19830383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.