Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19828803›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2009

Convergence of cranial visceral afferents within the solitary tract nucleus.

Stuart J McDougall, James H Peters, Michael C Andresen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cardiac vagal motor neurons.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Polysialic Acid Regulates Sympathetic Outflow by Facilitating Information Transfer within the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stuart J McDougallDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239-3098, USA. stuart.mcdougall@gmail.com
James H Peters
Michael C Andresen
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Transmission Across the First Synapse of the BaroreflexR01HL041119 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI ANDRESEN, MICHAEL CHRISTIAN · 1991 to 2009
$2.9M
Central TRPV1 in Cardiovascular RegulationR01HL105703 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDRESEN, MICHAEL CHRISTIAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
Oxytocin enhances afferent synaptic transmission within the NTS.F32HL088894 · NHLBI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERS, JAMES HENRY · 2007 to 2009
$137k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32 HL088894NHLBI NIH HHS HL-41119NHLBI NIH HHS HL-88894NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL041119NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary afferent axons within the solitary tract (ST) relay homeostatic information via glutamatergic synapses directly to second-order neurons within the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS). These primary afferents arise from multiple organ systems and relay multiple sensory modalities. How this compact network organizes the flow of primary afferent information will shape central homeostatic control. To assess afferent convergence and divergence, we recorded ST-evoked synaptic responses in pairs of medial NTS neurons in horizontal brainstem slices. ST shocks activated EPSCs along monosynaptic or polysynaptic pathways. Gradations in shock intensity discriminated multiple inputs and stimulus recruitment profiles indicated that each EPSC was unitary. In 24 pairs, 75% were second-order neurons with 64% receiving one direct ST input with the remainder receiving additional convergent ST afferent inputs (22% two; 14% three monosynaptic ST-EPSCs). Some (34%) second-order neurons received polysynaptic EPSCs. Neurons receiving only higher-order inputs were uncommon (13%). Most ST-EPSCs were completely independent, but 4 EPSCs of a total of 81 had equal thresholds, highly correlated latencies, and synchronized synaptic failures consistent with divergence from a single source ST axon or from a common interneuron producing a pair of polysynaptic EPSCs. We conclude that ST afferent inputs are remarkably independent with little evidence of substantial shared information. Individual cells receive highly focused information from the viscera. Thus, afferent excitation of second-order NTS neurons is generally dominated by single visceral afferents and therefore focused on a single afferent modality and/or organ region.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBiophysicsBrain MappingElectric StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsIn Vitro TechniquesNerve NetNeurons, AfferentPatch-Clamp TechniquesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeSolitary NucleusSynapses

Identifiers

PMID19828803
PMCPMC2797442
OpenAlexW2041971204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.