Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19827163›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2009

Birthdays of retinal amacrine cell subtypes are systematically related to their molecular identity and soma position.

P Emanuela Voinescu, P Emanuela, Jeremy N Kay, Joshua R Sanes

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Emanuela, P [corrected to Voinescu, P Emanuela]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

P Emanuela VoinescuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
P Emanuela
Jeremy N Kay
Joshua R Sanes

Funding

Synaptic Choices in the Retinotectal SystemR01NS029169 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JOSHUA R · 1991 to 2012
$6.0M
Synaptic Choices in the Retinotectal SystemR37NS029169 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SANES, JOSHUA R · 2013 to 2019
$4.0M
NINDS NIH HHS NS029169NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS029169NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS029169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian retina contains six major cell types, several of which are divided into multiple molecularly and morphologically distinct subtypes. To understand how subtype diversity arises during development, we focused on amacrine interneurons in the mouse retina; approximately 30 amacrine subtypes have been identified in mammals. We used antibody markers to identify the two main amacrine subsets--GABAergic and glycinergic--and further subdivided these groups into smaller subsets based on expression of neurotransmitter and transcription factor markers. We then used bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling to see whether amacrine subsets are born (become postmitotic) at different times, as is the case for lamina-specified subsets of cortical projection neurons. We found that GABAergic amacrines are generated on average 2-3 days before glycinergic amacrines. Moreover, subsets of GABAergic amacrines are born at distinct times. We also found a strong correlation between amacrine cell birthday and soma position in the mature retina, another point of similarity with cortical projection neurons. This relationship raised the possibility that amacrine subtype identity is determined by signals that uncommitted cells receive after they migrate to their destinations. However, cells labeled with BrdU in vivo, then dissociated and allowed to develop in vitro, acquired the amacrine subtype-specific markers appropriate for their birthdays, supporting the idea that they become specified near the time and place of their birth. Together, our results suggest that the birthdays of amacrine cells independently specify their destinations and subtype identities.

Indexed as

Amacrine CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCellular Senescencegamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlycineMiceNeurogenesisRetinaTime Factorsgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlycine

Identifiers

PMID19827163
PMCPMC2814066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.