Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19826403›Full record

Trial reportMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2010

Advanced phase I/II studies of targeted gene delivery in vivo: intravenous Rexin-G for gemcitabine-resistant metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Sant P Chawla, Victoria S Chua, Lita Fernandez, Dorris Quon, William C Blackwelder, Erlinda M Gordon, Frederick L Hall

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Advances in HIV Gene Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Exploiting Oncogenic Drivers along theMolecular therapy oncolytics · 2018
    Review
  12. Gene Therapy for Pancreatic Diseases: Current Status.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Gene Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Specificity, Issues and Hopes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  17. Rexin-GMolecular and clinical oncology · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sant P ChawlaSarcoma Oncology Center, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Victoria S Chua
Lita Fernandez
Dorris Quon
William C Blackwelder
Erlinda M Gordon
Frederick L Hall
Sarcoma Oncology Center · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Phase I Clinical Trial Using Rexin-G for Pancreatic Can*R01FD003071 · FDA · EPEIUS BIOTECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION · PI HALL, FREDERICK L · 2006 to 2007
$290k
FDA HHS 1 R01 FD003071FDA HHS R01 FD003071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rexin-G, a nonreplicative pathology-targeted retroviral vector bearing a cytocidal cyclin G1 construct, was tested in a phase I/II study for gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer. The patients received escalating doses of Rexin-G intravenously from 1 x 10(11) colony-forming units (cfu) 2-3x a week (dose 0-1) to 2 x 10(11) cfu 3x a week (dose 2) for 4 weeks. Treatment was continued if there was less than or equal to grade 1 toxicity. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed, and no vector DNA integration, replication-competent retrovirus (RCR), or vector-neutralizing antibodies were noted. In nine evaluable patients, 3/3 patients had stable disease (SD) at dose 0-1. At dose 2, 1/6 patients had a partial response (PR) and 5/6 patients had SD. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months at dose 0-1, and >7.65 months at dose 2. Median overall survival (OS) was 4.3 months at dose 0-1, and 9.2 months at dose 2. One-year survival was 0% at dose 0-1 compared to 28.6% at dose 2, suggesting a dose-response relationship between OS and Rexin-G dosage. Taken together, these data indicate that (i) Rexin-G is safe and well tolerated, and (ii) Rexin-G may help control tumor growth, and may possibly prolong survival in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer, thus, earning US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) fast-track designation as second-line treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Cyclin G1DeoxycytidineGemcitabineGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansNeoplasm MetastasisPancreatic NeoplasmsRetroviridaeCyclin G1DeoxycytidineGemcitabine

Identifiers

PMID19826403
PMCPMC2839309
OpenAlexW2003047168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.