Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19826351›Full record

SynthesisCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

Lessons to be learned from 25 years of research investigating psychosocial interventions for cancer patients.

Anne Moyer, Sarah K Knapp-Oliver, Stephanie J Sohl, Stefan Schnieder, Anna H L Floyd

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04656496 (NOURISH-T+), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04656496 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

NOURISH-T+: A Randomized Control Trial Targeting Parents in Promoting Healthy Eating and Exercise Behaviors in Pediatric Cancer Survivors With Overweight/Obesity

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of South FloridaRan2020 to 2027Enrolled520ConditionsObesity, Childhood, Cancer, SurvivorshipArmsNOURISH-T+, Brief NOURISH-T+
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effectiveness of psychoeducational support on quality of life in early-stage breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Santería as Informal Mental Health Support Among U.S. Latinos with Cancer.Journal of religion & spirituality in social work · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne MoyerDepartment of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA. anne.moyer@sunysb.edu
Sarah K Knapp-Oliver
Stephanie J Sohl
Stefan Schnieder
Anna H L Floyd

Funding

Review of Psychosocial Interventions for CancerR01CA100810 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI MOYER, ANNE E · 2004 to 2006
$403k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting rigorous psychosocial intervention research with cancer patients has many challenges including encouraging them to join studies, asking them to engage in interventions or be part of control conditions, and to provide data over follow-up assessments. Here, we highlight valuable insights regarding such challenges provided by investigators studying psychosocial interventions for cancer patients. Handling these skillfully has important implications for the internal and external validity of this research and the ethical treatment of participants. Challenges noted in research reports included in a systematic review of 25 years of research (comprising 488 unique projects) investigating interventions designed to enhance cancer patients' quality of life were compiled. Among the difficulties mentioned was the fact that patients may not feel the need for psychosocial interventions and thus may not be interested in joining an intervention study. Patients who do feel the need for such interventions may be deterred from joining trials by the prospect of being randomized to a nonpreferred group; if they do join a trial, participants may be disappointed, drop out, or seek compensatory additional assistance when they are assigned to a control group. Apart from randomization, other aspects of research may be off-putting to participants or potential participants, such as the language of consent forms or the intrusiveness of questions being asked. Potential remedies, such as research awareness interventions, monetary incentives, partnering with cancer support organizations, and using designs that take preferences into account merit consideration and further research inquiry.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHumansNeoplasmsPatient CompliancePatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch SubjectsSociology, Medical

Identifiers

PMID19826351
PMCPMC3032403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.