Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19825179›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2009

Distinct inherited metastasis susceptibility exists for different breast cancer subtypes: a prognosis study.

Szu-Min Hsieh, Maxime P Look, Anieta M Sieuwerts, John A Foekens, Kent W Hunter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact ofCancers · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Mechanisms of breast cancer metastasis.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The role of individual inheritance in tumor progression and metastasis.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2015
    Review
  13. The SIPA1 -313A>G polymorphism is associated with prognosis in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Szu-Min HsiehLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, NCI, NIH, Room 5046, 37 Convent Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-4264, USA. hsiehsz@mail.nih.gov
Maxime P Look
Anieta M Sieuwerts
John A Foekens
Kent W Hunter
Cancer Genetics (United States) · USErasmus University Rotterdam · NLCancer Genomics Centre · NL

Funding

Genetic Modifiers of Intitiation and Progression of Mammary CancerZIABC011255 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HUNTER, KENT WILLIAM · 2010 to 2025
$33.2M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious studies in mouse models and pilot epidemiology studies have demonstrated that inherited polymorphisms are associated with inherited risk of tumor progression and poor outcome in human breast cancer. To extend these studies and gain better understanding of the function of inherited polymorphism in breast cancer progression, a validation prognosis study was performed in a large independent breast cancer patient population.

methodsThe study population consisted of 1863 Dutch patients with operable primary breast cancer from Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Genomic DNA was genotyped for the missense Pro436Leu RRP1B single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs9306160 and the intronic SIPA1 SNP rs2448490 by SNP-specific PCR.

resultsA significant association of variants in RRP1B with metastasis-free survival was observed (P = 0.012), validating the role of RRP1B with inherited metastatic susceptibility. Stratification of patients revealed that association with patients' survival was found to be specifically restricted to estrogen receptor positive, lymph node-negative (ER+/LN-) patients (P = 0.011). The specific association with metastasis-free survival only in ER+/LN- patients was replicated for SIPA1, a second metastasis susceptibility gene known to physically interact with RRP1B (P = 0.006). Combining the genotypes of these two genes resulted in the significant ability to discriminate patients with poor metastasis-free survival (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.68, P = 0.001).

conclusionsThese results validate SIPA1 and RRP1B as metastasis susceptibility genes and suggest that genotyping assays may be a useful supplement to other clinical and molecular indicators of prognosis. The results also suggest that lymphatic and hematogeneous metastases are genetically distinct that may involve different mechanisms. If true, these results suggest that metastatic disease, like primary breast cancer, may be multiple diseases and that stratification of late stage patients may therefore be required to fully understand breast cancer progression and metastasis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGTPase-Activating ProteinsHumansLymphatic MetastasisMiddle AgedMutation, MissenseNeoplasm MetastasisNuclear ProteinsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisReceptors, EstrogenGTPase-Activating ProteinsNuclear ProteinsReceptors, EstrogenRRP1 protein, humanSIPA1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID19825179
PMCPMC2790856
OpenAlexW2141602052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.