Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19824777›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2009

Interval timing accuracy and scalar timing in C57BL/6 mice.

Catalin V Buhusi, Dyana Aziz, David Winslow, Rickey E Carter, Joshua E Swearingen, Mona C Buhusi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mice monitor their timing errors.Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mediodorsal Thalamus Contributes to the Timing of Instrumental Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  11. Weber's Law and the Scalar Property of Timing: A Test of Canine Timing.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Using Temporal Expectation to Assess Auditory Streaming in Mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Mice can count and optimize count-based decisions.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2016
    Article
  19. What is all the noise about in interval timing?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catalin V BuhusiDepartment of Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425-0510, USA. buhusi@musc.edu
Dyana Aziz
David Winslow
Rickey E Carter
Joshua E Swearingen
Mona C Buhusi

Funding

ATTENTIONAL PROCESSING OF TEMPORAL INFORMATIONR01MH065561 · NIMH · UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BUHUSI, CATALIN V. · 2002 to 2013
$2.0M
MUSC FACIL EXPANSION &RENOV: SLE C06RR015455 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI RAYMOND, JOHN R · 2002 to 2002
$2.0M
REPRESENTATION OF TEMPORAL INFORMATIONR01MH073057 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BUHUSI, CATALIN V. · 2006 to 2009
$824k
ATTENTIONAL PROCESSING OF TEMPORAL INFORMATIONR56MH065561 · NIMH · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BUHUSI, CATALIN V. · 2009 to 2009
$286k
NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR015455NIMH NIH HHS MH065561NIMH NIH HHS MH73057NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065561NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073057NIMH NIH HHS R56 MH065561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many species, interval timing behavior is accurate-appropriate estimated durations-and scalar-errors vary linearly with estimated durations. Whereas accuracy has been previously examined, scalar timing has not been clearly demonstrated in house mice (Mus musculus), raising concerns about mouse models of human disease. The authors estimated timing accuracy and precision in C57BL/6 mice, the most used background strain for genetic models of human disease, in a peak-interval procedure with multiple intervals. Both when timing 2 intervals (Experiment 1) or 3 intervals (Experiment 2), C57BL/6 mice demonstrated varying degrees of timing accuracy. An important finding was that, both at the individual and group levels, their precision varied linearly with the subjective estimated duration. Further evidence for scalar timing was obtained using an intraclass correlation statistic. This is the first report of consistent, reliable scalar timing in a sizable sample of house mice, thus validating the peak-interval procedure as a valuable technique, the intraclass correlation statistic as a powerful test of the scalar property, and the C57BL/6 strain as a suitable background for behavioral investigations of genetically engineered mice modeling disorders of interval timing.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsConditioning, OperantMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReinforcement ScheduleTime FactorsTime Perception

Identifiers

PMID19824777
PMCPMC2822645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.