Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19821391›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Speech therapy for children with dysarthria acquired before three years of age.

Lindsay Pennington, Nick Miller, Sheila Robson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Communication Modes and Functions in Children With Cerebral Palsy.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsay PenningtonInstitute of Health and Society, University of Newcastle, Sir James Spence Institute - Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, NE1 4LP.
Nick Miller
Sheila Robson
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF/01/021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with motor impairments often have the motor speech disorder dysarthria, a condition which effects the tone, power and coordination of any or all of the muscles used for speech. Resulting speech difficulties can range from mild, with slightly slurred articulation and low-pitched voice, to profound, with an inability to produce any recognisable words. Children with dysarthria are often prescribed communication aids to supplement their natural forms of communication. However, there is variation in practice regarding the provision of therapy focusing on voice and speech production. Descriptive studies have suggested that therapy may improve speech, but its effectiveness has not been evaluated.

objectivesTo assess whether direct intervention aimed at improving the speech of children with dysarthria is more effective than no intervention at all. To assess whether individual types of intervention are more effective than others in improving the speech intelligibility of children with dysarthria. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL , LLBA, ERIC, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, UK National Research Register and Dissertation Abstracts up to April 2009, handsearched relevant journals published between 1980 and April 2009, and searched proceedings of relevant conferences between 1996-2009. SELECTION CRITERIA: We considered randomised controlled trials and studies using quasi-experimental designs in which children were allocated to groups using non-random methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: L Pennington conducted searches of all databases and conference reports. L Pennington, N Miller and S Robson handsearched journals. All searches included a reliability check in which a second review author independently checked a random sample comprising 15% of all identified reports. We planned that two review authors would independently assess the quality and extract data from eligible studies. MAIN

resultsNo randomised controlled trials or group studies were identified. AUTHORS'

conclusionsWe found no firm evidence of the effectiveness of speech and language therapy to improve the speech of children with early acquired dysarthria. No change in practice is warranted at the present time. Rigorous research is needed to investigate if the positive changes in children's speech observed in small descriptive studies are shown in randomised controlled trials. Research should examine change in children's speech production and intelligibility. It should also investigate the secondary education, health and social care outcomes of intervention, including children's interaction with family, friends and teachers, their participation in social and educational activities, and their quality of life. Cost and acceptability of interventions must also be investigated.

Indexed as

Speech TherapyChildChild, PreschoolDysarthriaHumansSpeech Intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID19821391
OpenAlexW4254916166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.