Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19821341›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents.

Chioma Oringanje, Martin M Meremikwu, Hokehe Eko, Ekpereonne Esu, Anne Meremikwu, John E Ehiri

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chioma OringanjeInstitute of Tropical Disease Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria.
Martin M Meremikwu
Hokehe Eko
Ekpereonne Esu
Anne Meremikwu
John E Ehiri

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintended pregnancy among adolescents represent an important public health challenge in developed and developing countries. Numerous prevention strategies such as health education, skills-building and improving accessibility to contraceptives have been employed by countries across the world, in an effort to address this problem. However, there is uncertainty regarding the effects of these intervention, and hence the need to review their evidence-base

objectivesTo assess the effects of primary prevention interventions (school-based, community/home-based, clinic-based, and faith-based) on unintended pregnancies among adolescents. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases (CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE) ending December 2008. Cross-referencing, hand-searching, and contacting experts yielded additional citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included both individual and cluster randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating any interventions that aimed to increase knowledge and attitudes relating to risk of unintended pregnancies, promote delay in the initiation of sexual intercourse and encourage consistent use of birth control methods to reduce unintended pregnancies in adolescents aged 10-19 years. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias in studies that met the inclusion criteria. Where appropriate, binary outcomes were pooled using random effects model with a 95% confidence interval (Cl). MAIN

resultsForty one RCTs that enrolled 95,662 adolescents were included. Participants were ethnically diverse. Eleven studies randomized individuals, twenty seven randomized clusters (schools (19), classrooms (5), and communities/neighbourhoods (3). Three studies were mixed (individually and cluster randomized). The length of follow up varied from 3 months to 4.5 years. Data could only be pooled for a number of studies (15) because of variations in the reporting of outcomes. Results showed that multiple interventions (combination of educational and contraceptive interventions) lowered the rate of unintended pregnancy among adolescents. Evidence on the possible effects of interventions on secondary outcomes (initiation of sexual intercourse, use of birth control methods, abortion, childbirth, sexually transmitted diseases) is not conclusive.Methodological strengths included a relatively large sample size and statistical control for baseline differences, while limitations included lack of biological outcomes, possible self-report bias, analysis neglecting clustered randomization and the use of different statistical test in reporting outcomes. AUTHORS'

conclusionsCombination of educational and contraceptive interventions appears to reduce unintended pregnancy among adolescents. Evidence for program effects on biological measures is limited. The variability in study populations, interventions and outcomes of included trials, and the paucity of studies directly comparing different interventions preclude a definitive conclusion regarding which type of intervention is most effective.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, UnplannedAdolescentChildFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy in AdolescenceRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.