SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Interventions for preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Use of contraceptives, empowerment and agency of adolescent girls and young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ sexual & reproductive health · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Do School-Based Programs Prevent HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections in Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2018Pooled it
- Reducing repeat pregnancies in adolescence: applying realist principles as part of a mixed-methods systematic review to explore what works, for whom, how and under what circumstances.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2016Pooled it
- Brief educational strategies for improving contraception use in young people.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Programs to Strengthen Parent-Adolescent Communication About Reproductive Health: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Systematic Review Evidence Methodology: Providing Quality Family Planning Services.American journal of preventive medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Comprehensive adolescent health programs that include sexual and reproductive health services: a systematic review.American journal of public health · 2014Pooled it
- Preconception care: promoting reproductive planning.Reproductive health · 2014Pooled it
- Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Caregiver behavior change for child survival and development in low- and middle-income countries: an examination of the evidence.Journal of health communication · 2014Pooled it
- Interventions for encouraging sexual behaviours intended to prevent cervical cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Effects of a whole-school relationships and sexual health intervention on non-competent sexual debut: cluster-randomised trial.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2026Trial
- Goals for girls: a cluster-randomized trial to investigate a school-based sexual health programme amongst female learners in South Africa.Health education research · 2023Trial
- Effects of gender-transformative relationships and sexuality education to reduce adolescent pregnancy (the JACK trial): a cluster-randomised trial.The Lancet. Public health · 2022Trial
- An interactive website to aid young women's choice of contraception: feasibility and efficacy RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020Trial
- Translating group programmes into online formats: establishing the acceptability of a parents' sex and relationships communication serious game.BMC public health · 2015Trial
- Short-term effects of a rights-based sexuality education curriculum for high-school students: a cluster-randomized trial.BMC public health · 2015Trial
- Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnintended pregnancy among adolescents represent an important public health challenge in developed and developing countries. Numerous prevention strategies such as health education, skills-building and improving accessibility to contraceptives have been employed by countries across the world, in an effort to address this problem. However, there is uncertainty regarding the effects of these intervention, and hence the need to review their evidence-base
objectivesTo assess the effects of primary prevention interventions (school-based, community/home-based, clinic-based, and faith-based) on unintended pregnancies among adolescents. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases (CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE) ending December 2008. Cross-referencing, hand-searching, and contacting experts yielded additional citations. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included both individual and cluster randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating any interventions that aimed to increase knowledge and attitudes relating to risk of unintended pregnancies, promote delay in the initiation of sexual intercourse and encourage consistent use of birth control methods to reduce unintended pregnancies in adolescents aged 10-19 years. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility and risk of bias in studies that met the inclusion criteria. Where appropriate, binary outcomes were pooled using random effects model with a 95% confidence interval (Cl). MAIN
resultsForty one RCTs that enrolled 95,662 adolescents were included. Participants were ethnically diverse. Eleven studies randomized individuals, twenty seven randomized clusters (schools (19), classrooms (5), and communities/neighbourhoods (3). Three studies were mixed (individually and cluster randomized). The length of follow up varied from 3 months to 4.5 years. Data could only be pooled for a number of studies (15) because of variations in the reporting of outcomes. Results showed that multiple interventions (combination of educational and contraceptive interventions) lowered the rate of unintended pregnancy among adolescents. Evidence on the possible effects of interventions on secondary outcomes (initiation of sexual intercourse, use of birth control methods, abortion, childbirth, sexually transmitted diseases) is not conclusive.Methodological strengths included a relatively large sample size and statistical control for baseline differences, while limitations included lack of biological outcomes, possible self-report bias, analysis neglecting clustered randomization and the use of different statistical test in reporting outcomes. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCombination of educational and contraceptive interventions appears to reduce unintended pregnancy among adolescents. Evidence for program effects on biological measures is limited. The variability in study populations, interventions and outcomes of included trials, and the paucity of studies directly comparing different interventions preclude a definitive conclusion regarding which type of intervention is most effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19821341What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.