SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Chinese herbal medicines for esophageal cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chinese herbal medicine for oesophageal cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Potential Antitumor Effect of Harmine in the Treatment of Thyroid Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017Article
- Herbal traditional Chinese medicine and its evidence base in gastrointestinal disorders.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Antiproliferative Activity of the Chinese Medicinal Compound, Delisheng, Compared With Rg3 and Gemcitabine in HepG2 Cells.Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2013Article
- Developments in cancer prevention and treatment using traditional Chinese medicine.Frontiers of medicine · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Traditional Chinese herbal medicines are sometimes used as an adjunct to radiotherapy or chemotherapy for this type of cancer.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and possible adverse effects of the addition of Chinese herbal medicines to treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register, The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database), CBM (Chinese Biomedical Database), China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Cochrane Centre Controlled Trials Register and CISCOM (The Research Council for Complementary Medicine) (up to 10 July, 2008). Databases of ongoing trials, the Internet and reference lists were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing the use of radiotherapy or chemotherapy with and without the addition of Chinese herbal medicines. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two review authors extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN
resultsWe identified 43 trials which claimed to use random allocation. The first authors of all the RCTs we initially identified were contacted by telephone and we discovered that the authors had misunderstood the randomisation procedure. Using this new information, we reassigned all the identified RCTs as non-randomised trials. Because we identified no authentic randomised controlled trials, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis. AUTHORS'
conclusionsWe were unable to find any evidence from RCTs on the effectiveness of TCM in the treatment of esophageal cancer. New trials should be carried out and we recommend that they are large scaled, correctly randomised and that the assessors of the results are blinded to the conditions of allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.