Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19821304›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009

Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.

Zarko Alfirevic, Anthony J Kelly, Therese Dowswell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02756689 (Outpatient Foley for Starting Induction of Labor at Term), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02756689 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Outpatient Foley for Starting Induction of Labor at Term

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2016 to 2017Enrolled129ConditionsPregnancyArmsInpatient cervical ripening, Outpatient cervical ripening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 256 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  9. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  10. Concordance of effects of medical interventions on hospital admission and readmission rates with effects on mortality.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2013
    Pooled it
  11. Internal versus external tocodynamometry during induced or augmented labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  12. Castor oil, bath and/or enema for cervical priming and induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  13. Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2011
    Pooled it
  14. Oral prostaglandin E2 for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2001
    Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Foley catheter for induction of labor: potential barriers to adopting the technique.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015
    Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Zarko AlfirevicSchool of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Division of Perinatal and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Liverpool, First Floor, Liverpool Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Crown Street, Liverpool, UK, L8 7SS.
Anthony J Kelly
Therese Dowswell
Cochrane · GBLiverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Sussex County Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health CPGS02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOxytocin is the commonest induction agent used worldwide. It has been used alone, in combination with amniotomy or following cervical ripening with other pharmacological or non-pharmacological methods.

objectivesTo determine the effects of oxytocin alone for third trimester cervical ripening and induction of labour in comparison with other methods of induction of labour or placebo/no treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (January 2009) and bibliographies of relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing intravenous oxytocin with placebo or no treatment, or with prostaglandins (vaginal or intracervical) for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed eligibility and carried out data extraction. MAIN

resultsSixty-one trials (12,819 women) are included.When oxytocin inductions were compared with expectant management, fewer women failed to deliver vaginally within 24 hours (8.4% versus 53.8%, risk ratio (RR) 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 0.25). There was a significant increase in the number of women requiring epidural analgesia (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.17). Fewer women were dissatisfied with oxytocin induction in the one trial reporting this outcome (5.9% versus 13.7%, RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.56).Compared with vaginal prostaglandins, oxytocin increased unsuccessful vaginal delivery within 24 hours in the two trials reporting this outcome (70% versus 21%, RR 3.33, 95% CI 1.61 to 6.89). There was a small increase in epidurals when oxytocin alone was used (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.17).Most of the studies included women with ruptured membranes, and there was some evidence that vaginal prostaglandin increased infection in mothers (chorioamnionitis RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.92) and babies (use of antibiotics RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.87). These data should be interpreted cautiously as infection was not pre-specified in the original review protocol.When oxytocin was compared with intracervical prostaglandins, there was an increase in unsuccessful vaginal delivery within 24 hours (50.4% versus 34.6%, RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.96) and an increase in caesarean sections (19.1% versus 13.7%, RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.74) in the oxytocin group. AUTHORS'

conclusionsComparison of oxytocin with either intravaginal or intracervical PGE2 reveals that the prostaglandin agents probably increase the chances of achieving vaginal birth within 24 hours. Oxytocin induction may increase the rate of interventions in labour.A suggestion that for women with prelabour rupture of membranes induction with vaginal prostaglandin may increase risk of infection for mother and baby warrants further study.

Indexed as

Cervical RipeningLabor, InducedDinoprostoneFemaleHumansInjections, IntravenousOxytocicsOxytocinPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDinoprostoneOxytocicsOxytocin

Identifiers

PMID19821304
PMCPMC4164045
OpenAlexW2085958185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.