SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traditional Chinese medicine interventions based on meridian theory for pain relief in patients with primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Combined oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Nifedipine for primary dysmenorrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- The effectiveness of self-care and lifestyle interventions in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC complementary and alternative medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Acupuncture for dysmenorrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for dysmenorrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Dysmenorrhoea.BMJ clinical evidence · 2011Pooled it
- The effect of listening to music and drawing on coping with dysmenorrhea complaints in nursing students: randomized controlled trial.BMC women's health · 2024Trial
- The Effect of Aviva Exercise Intervention on Pain Level and Body Awareness in Women with Primary Dysmenorrhea.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Trial
- An Open Trial of a Mind-Body Intervention for Young Women with Moderate to Severe Primary Dysmenorrhea.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Continuous compared with cyclic oral contraceptives for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: a randomized controlled trial.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2012Trial
- Efficacy of ethinylestradiol 20 μg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen in women with moderate-to-severe primary dysmenorrhoea: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled study.The journal of family planning and reproductive health care · 2012Trial
- Anti-Dysmenorrhea Effects and Safety of Guizhi Fuling Capsules for Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Therapeutic Physical Exercise for Dysmenorrhea: A Scoping Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Review
- Adenomyosis: An Update Concerning Diagnosis, Treatment, and Fertility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2024.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2024Article
- Prevalence, pain intensity and symptoms associated with primary dysmenorrhea: a cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysmenorrhoea (painful menstrual cramps) is common. Combined OCPs are recommended in the management of primary dysmenorrhoea.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness and safety of combined oral contraceptive pills for the management of primary dysmenorrhoea. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted electronic searches for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Register of controlled trials CENTRAL, CCTR, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL (first conducted in 2001, updated on 5 November 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs comparing all combined OCPs with other combined OCPs, placebo, no management, or management with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs) were considered. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Twenty three studies were identified and ten were included. Six compared the combined OCP with placebo and four compared different dosages of combined OCP. MAIN
resultsOne study of low dose oestrogen and four studies of medium dose oestrogen combined OCPs compared with placebo, for a combined total of 497 women, reported pain improvement. For the outcome of pain relief across the different OCPs the pooled OR suggested benefit with OCPs compared to placebo (7 RCTs: Peto OR 2.01 [95% CI 1.32, 3.08]).The Chi-squared test for heterogeneity showed there is significant heterogeneity with an I(2) statistic of 64% and a significant chi-square test (14.06, df=5, p=0.02). A sensitivity analysis removing the studies with inadequate allocation concealment suggested significant benefit of treatment with the pooled OR of 2.99 (95% CI 1.76, 5.07) and heterogeneity no longer statistically significant and I(2) statistic of 0%.Three studies reported adverse effects (Davis 2005; Hendrix 2002; GPRG 1968) The adverse effects were nausea, headaches and weight gain. Two studies reported if women experienced any side effect and no evidence of an effect was found (3 RCTs: OR = 1.45 (95% 0.71, 2.94). There was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity.There were no studies identified that compared combined OCP versus non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugsThere was no evidence of a difference for the pooled studies for 3rd generation pro gestagens (OR = 1.11 (95% CI 0.79 - 1.57)). For the 2nd generation versus 3rd generation the OR was 0.44 (95% CI 0.23-0.84) suggesting benefit of the 3rd generation OCP but this was for a single study (Winkler 2003). AUTHORS'
conclusionsThere is limited evidence for pain improvement with the use of the OCP (both low and medium dose oestrogen) in women with dysmenorrhoea. There is no evidence of a difference between different OCP preparations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.