SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of thoracic radiotherapy timing in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: usefulness of the individual patient data meta-analysis.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2016Pooled it
- Chemotherapy versus best supportive care for extensive small cell lung cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Prognostic significance of serum soluble DR5 levels in small-cell lung cancer.International journal of medical sciences · 2019Trial
- Article
- Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Efficacy and Immune-Related Adverse Events of First-Line Chemoimmunotherapy in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- miR-196a Upregulation Contributes to Gefitinib Resistance through Inhibiting GLTP Expression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- New insights into small-cell lung cancer development and therapy.Cell biology international · 2020Review
- Vasculogenic mimicry in small cell lung cancer.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Vorinostat enhances the cisplatin-mediated anticancer effects in small cell lung cancer cells.BMC cancer · 2016Article
- HSP-90 inhibitor ganetespib is synergistic with doxorubicin in small cell lung cancer.Oncogene · 2014Article
- Chemotherapy advances in small-cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2013Review
- The role of anthracyclines in small cell lung cancer.Annals of translational medicine · 2013Review
- Palliative care in poor-performance status small cell lung cancer patients: is there a mandatory role for chemotherapy?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012Article
- A systematic analysis of efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in sensitive and refractory small-cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2012Article
- Early CT and FDG-metabolic tumour volume changes show a significant correlation with survival in stage I-III small cell lung cancer: a hypothesis generating study.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCombination chemotherapy has been the mainstay of treatment for extensive stage small celI lung cancer (SCLC) over the last 30 years even though it only gives a short prolongation in median survival time. The main goal for these patients should be palliation with the aim of improving their quality of life.
objectivesTo evaluate the effectiveness of chemotherapy in extensive SCLC compared with best supportive care (BSC) or placebo treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (1966 to July 2008), EMBASE (1974 to week 31, 2008), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 3, 2008). Experts in the field were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials in which any chemotherapy treatment was compared with placebo or BSC in patients with extensive SCLC, as first or second therapy at relapse. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality. We resolved disagreements by discussion. Additional information was obtained from one study author. MAIN
resultsTwo studies were included for first-line chemotherapy. A total of 65 patients were randomised to receive either placebo or ifosfamide. Ifosfamide gave an extra mean survival of 78.5 days compared with placebo. Partial tumour response was greater with the active treatment. Toxicity was only seen in the chemotherapy group.Two studies were included for second-line chemotherapy at relapse. A total of 531 patients were randomised to receive either methotrexate-doxorubicin or symptomatic treatment, or to receive oral topotecan versus BSC. The methotrexate-doxorubicin treatment gave a median survival of 63 days longer than in the symptomatic treatment group, and 21 days longer for patients allocated to receive four or eight cycles of first-line chemotherapy, respectively.Treatment with topotecan gave a median survival of 84 days longer than in the BSC group (log-rank P = 0.01). The adjusted hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.61 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.87). Partial or complete response in the methotrexate-doxorubicin group was 22.3%. Five patients (7%, 95% CI, 2.33 to 15.67) showed a partial response with topotecan. Toxicity was worst in the chemotherapy group. Quality of life was better in the topotecan group. AUTHORS'
conclusionsChemotherapeutic treatment prolongs survival in comparison with placebo in patients with advanced SCLC. Nevertheless, the impact of first-line chemotherapy on quality of life and in patients with poor prognosis is unknown. Well-designed, controlled trials are needed to further evaluate the risks and benefits of different chemotherapeutic schedules in patients with advanced SCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.