SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2009
Oral contraceptive pill for heavy menstrual bleeding.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pictorial methods to assess heavy menstrual bleeding in research and clinical practice: a systematic literature review.BMC women's health · 2020Pooled it
- Combined hormonal contraceptives for heavy menstrual bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Non-surgical interventions for treating heavy menstrual bleeding (menorrhagia) in women with bleeding disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016Pooled it
- Use of mixed-treatment-comparison methods in estimating efficacy of treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding.European journal of medical research · 2013Pooled it
- Menstrual-related symptoms and absence from school among young people in Sweden: a stratified, randomized, population-based survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
- How Women Discuss Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Online Forums ("It's Like Revenge of the Uterus"): Template Approach to Thematic Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Reversible female contraceptives: historical, current, and future perspectives†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Review
- The Use and Efficacy of Mobile Fertility-tracking Applications as a Method of Contraception: a Survey.Current obstetrics and gynecology reports · 2021Review
- Heavy menstrual bleeding diagnosis and medical management.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2017Review
- Knowledge of Latin American Obstetricians and Gynecologists regarding Heavy Menstrual Bleeding.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2016Article
- Satisfaction and health-related quality of life in women with heavy menstrual bleeding; results from a non-interventional trial of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or conventional medical therapy.International journal of women's health · 2014Article
- Heavy menstrual flow: current and future trends in management.Reviews in obstetrics & gynecology · 2013Article
- Hormonal anticonception anno 2013: a clinician's view.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2013Article
- Practice patterns and attitudes about treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a national survey of obstetricians and gynecologists.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2011Article
- Open-access transvaginal sonography in women of reproductive age with abnormal vaginal bleeding: a descriptive study in general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMenorrhagia (heavy menstrual bleeding) is a benign yet debilitating social and health condition. Treatments prescribed in order to reduce excessive menstrual blood loss include prostaglandin synthetase inhibitors, antifibrinolytics, the oral contraceptive pill and other hormones. The combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is claimed to have a variety of beneficial, inducing a regular shedding of a thinner endometrium and inhibiting ovulation thus having the effect of treating menorrhagia and providing contraception.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of oral contraceptive pills compared with other medical therapies, placebo or no therapy in the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group trials register (search dates: Oct 1996, May 2002, June 2004, April 2006 and June 2009) for all publications which describe randomised trials of OCP for the treatment of menorrhagia. This register is based on regular searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PsycINFO, the hand searching of 20 relevant journals and conference proceedings, and searches of several key grey literature sources. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled comparisons of OCP versus other medical therapies, placebo or no treatment for the treatment of menorrhagia. Women of reproductive years with regular heavy periods, measured either objectively or subjectively and greater than, or equal to, two months follow up. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All assessments of trial quality and data extraction were performed unblinded by at least two reviewers. Only one trial of 45 women met the inclusion criteria and none were excluded. MAIN
resultsAs the trial used a cross-over design, only data from the first treatment period (cycles three and four) were analysed. The results from all the three mefenamic acid groups were combined. There was no significant difference in menstrual blood loss (MBL) between those women treated with the OCP and danazol, mefenamic acid or naproxen. AUTHORS'
conclusionsOne small study found no significant difference between groups treated with OCP, mefenamic acid, low dose danazol or naproxen. Overall, the evidence from the one study is not sufficient to adequately assess the effectiveness of OCP.This review was unable to achieve its stated objectives because of the paucity of the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.