ArticleJournal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology2010
Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during industrial bioethanol fermentation.
Article in Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Response mechanism of ethanol-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain ES-42 to increased ethanol during continuous ethanol fermentation.Microbial cell factories · 2025Article
- Does Inter-Organellar Proteostasis Impact Yeast Quality and Performance During Beer Fermentation?Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Understanding the Mechanism of Thermotolerance Distinct From Heat Shock Response Through Proteomic Analysis of Industrial Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Time-based comparative transcriptomics in engineered xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies temperature-responsive genes during ethanol production.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2013Article
- Yeast toxicogenomics: genome-wide responses to chemical stresses with impact in environmental health, pharmacology, and biotechnology.Frontiers in genetics · 2012Article
- Identification of candidate genes for yeast engineering to improve bioethanol production in very high gravity and lignocellulosic biomass industrial fermentations.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2011Article
- The renaissance of continuous culture in the post-genomics age.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae is widely applied in large-scale industrial bioethanol fermentation; however, little is known about the molecular responses of industrial yeast during large-scale fermentation processes. We investigated the global transcriptional responses of an industrial strain of S. cerevisiae during industrial continuous and fed-batch fermentation by oligonucleotide-based microarrays. About 28 and 62% of all genes detected showed differential gene expression during continuous and fed-batch fermentation, respectively. The overrepresented functional categories of differentially expressed genes in continuous fermentation overlapped with those in fed-batch fermentation. Downregulation of glycosylation as well as upregulation of the unfolded protein stress response was observed in both fermentation processes, suggesting dramatic changes of environment in endoplasmic reticulum during industrial fermentation. Genes related to ergosterol synthesis and genes involved in glycogen and trehalose metabolism were downregulated in both fermentation processes. Additionally, changes in the transcription of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism coincided with the responses to glucose limitation during the early main fermentation stage in both processes. We also found that during the late main fermentation stage, yeast cells exhibited similar but stronger transcriptional changes during the fed-batch process than during the continuous process. Furthermore, repression of glycosylation has been suggested to be a secondary stress in the model proposed to explain the transcriptional responses of yeast during industrial fermentation. Together, these findings provide insights into yeast performance during industrial fermentation processes for bioethanol production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.