ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2010
The biocompatibility of sulfobetaine engineered polymethylmethacrylate by surface entrapment technique.
Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toxicity Evaluation of Sulfobetainized Branched Polyethyleneimine via Antibacterial and Biocompatibility Assays.Toxics · 2025Article
- Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Surface Treatment of Polymers and Influence on Cell Cultivation.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Effect of a synthetic link N peptide nanofiber scaffold on the matrix deposition of aggrecan and type II collagen in rabbit notochordal cells.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2013Article
- Physicochemical characterisation and biological evaluation of polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine engineered polyurethane (Tecoflex(®)).Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sulfobetaine-modified polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) systems were created by physically entrapping the zwitterionic species on the PMMA surface. The presence of the sulfobetaine molecules on these surfaces were verified by ATR-FTIR and SEM-EDAX analysis, while wettability of the films was investigated by dynamic contact angle measurements. The short-term (4 h) adhesion of two bacterial species (gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa) on these surfaces were studied. Mouse RAW 264.7 macrophage cells were used to assess the cell adhesion and inflammatory response by quantifying the expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines namely TNFalpha and IL1beta by measuring their mRNA profiles in the cells using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) normalized to the house keeping gene GAPDH. Whilst mouse L-929 fibroblast cells were used to assess the propensity for the materials to support fibroblast cell adhesion. A decrease in the adhesion of S. aureus by 63% and P. aeruginosa by 49% was observed on sulfobetaine modified PMMA films after 4 h. In all the cases, sulfobetaine modified PMMA films reduced cellular adhesion events (*P < 0.05) with respect to the base materials, which could be linked to the reduced protein adsorption observed on these surfaces. The cellular inflammatory response was suppressed on sulfobetaine modified substrates as expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNFalpha and IL1beta) was found to be up regulated on bare PMMA, while it was significantly lower on sulfobetaine modified PMMA (**P < 0.001). Thus the sulfobetaine entrapment process can be applied on polymethylmethacrylate in order to achieve low biointeractions and reduced inflammatory host responses for various biomedical and biotechnological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19821070What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.