Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19821027›Full record

ReviewNeurochemical research2009

Dendrite formation of cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Masahiko Tanaka

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurochemical research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Physiological Functions of the Golgin Vesicle Tethering Proteins.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Embryology.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Consensus Paper: Cerebellar Development.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masahiko TanakaDepartment of Cellular Biophysics, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya 467-8603, Japan. mtanaka@phar.nagoya-cu.ac.jp

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During postnatal cerebellar development, Purkinje cells form the most elaborate dendritic trees among neurons in the brain, which have been of great interest to many investigators. This article overviews various examples of cellular and molecular mechanisms of formation of Purkinje cell dendrites as well as the methodological aspects of investigating those mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Carrier ProteinsCells, CulturedCerebellumDendritesGenetic VectorsHomer Scaffolding ProteinsHumansNerve Tissue ProteinsPromoter Regions, GeneticPurkinje CellsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2Carrier ProteinsHomer Scaffolding ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsPurkinje cell protein L7

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.