Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19820454›Full record

ReviewHealth physics2009

Radiation carcinogenesis in context: how do irradiated tissues become tumors?

Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff, David H Nguyen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health physics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predictive DNA damage signaling for low‑dose ionizing radiation.International journal of molecular medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The Implications of Genetic Testing on Radiation Therapy Decisions: A Guide for Radiation Oncologists.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Researches of Epigenetic Epidemiology for Infections and Radiation as Carcinogen.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Radiation-induced sarcomas of the head and neck.World journal of clinical oncology · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary Helen Barcellos-HoffLife Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94705, USA. MHBarcellos-Hoff@nyumc.org
David H Nguyen

Funding

Bay Area Breast Cancer &the Environment Research CenterU01ES012801 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HIATT, ROBERT A · 2003 to 2010
$12.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS U01 ES012801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is clear from experimental studies that genotype is an important determinant of cancer susceptibility in general, and for radiation carcinogenesis specifically. It has become increasingly clear that genotype influences not only the ability to cope with DNA damage but also influences the cooperation of other tissues, like the vasculature and immune system, necessary for the establishment of cancer. Our experimental data and that of others suggest that the carcinogenic action of ionizing radiation (IR) can also be considered a two-compartment problem: while IR can alter genomic sequence as a result of DNA damage, it can also induce signals that alter multicellular interactions and phenotypes that underpin carcinogenesis. Rather than being accessory or secondary to genetic damage, we propose that such non-targeted radiation effects create the critical context that promotes cancer development. This review focuses on experimental studies that clearly define molecular mechanisms by which cell interactions contribute to cancer in different organs, and addresses how non-targeted radiation effects may similarly act though the microenvironment. The definition of non-targeted radiation effects and their dose dependence could modify the current paradigms for radiation risk assessment since radiation non-targeted effects, unlike DNA damage, are amenable to intervention. The implications of this perspective in terms of reducing cancer risk after exposure are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiobiologyTransforming Growth Factor betaTransforming Growth Factor beta

Identifiers

PMID19820454
PMCPMC2761885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.