Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19820152›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2009

Cryptosporidium spp. in wild, laboratory, and pet rodents in china: prevalence and molecular characterization.

Chaochao Lv, Longxian Zhang, Rongjun Wang, Fuchun Jian, Sumei Zhang, Changshen Ning, Helei Wang, Chao Feng, Xinwei Wang, Xupeng Ren and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 132 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Occurrence and Genetic Diversity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Emergence of zoonoticFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deciphering a cryptic minefield: A guide toCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Rodent-adaptedOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Public health and ecological significance of rodents inOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Review
  18. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chaochao LvCollege of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, No. 95 Wenhua Road, Zhengzhou 450002, China.
Longxian Zhang
Rongjun Wang
Fuchun Jian
Sumei Zhang
Changshen Ning
Helei Wang
Chao Feng
Xinwei Wang
Xupeng Ren
Meng Qi
Lihua Xiao
Henan Agricultural University · CNNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in rodents in China and to assess the potential role of rodents as a source for human cryptosporidiosis, 723 specimens from 18 rodent species were collected from four provinces of China and examined between August 2007 and December 2008 by microscopy after using Sheather's sugar flotation and modified acid-fast staining. Cryptosporidium oocysts were detected in 83 specimens, with an overall prevalence of 11.5%. Phodopus sungorus, Phodopus campbelli, and Rattus tanezumi were new reported hosts of Cryptosporidium. The genotypes and subtypes of Cryptosporidium strains in microscopy-positive specimens were further identified by PCR and sequence analysis of the small subunit rRNA and the 60-kDa glycoprotein (gp60) genes. In addition to Cryptosporidium parvum, C. muris, C. andersoni, C. wrairi, ferret genotype, and mouse genotype I, four new Cryptosporidium genotypes were identified, including the hamster genotype, chipmunk genotype III, and rat genotypes II and III. Mixed Cryptosporidium species/genotypes were found in 10.8% of Cryptosporidium-positive specimens. Sequence analysis of the gp60 gene showed that C. parvum strains in pet Siberian chipmunks and hamsters were all of the subtype IIdA15G1, which was found previously in a human isolate in The Netherlands and lambs in Spain. The gp60 sequences of C. wrairi and the Cryptosporidium ferret genotype and mouse genotype I were also obtained. These findings suggest that pet rodents may be potential reservoirs of zoonotic Cryptosporidium species and subtypes.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticCattleChinaCricetinaeCryptosporidiosisCryptosporidiumHumansMiceMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRatsRodent DiseasesRodentia

Identifiers

PMID19820152
PMCPMC2794099
OpenAlexW2118392614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.