Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19819738›Full record

ArticleBlood cells, molecules & diseases2010

Stoichiometries of transferrin receptors 1 and 2 in human liver.

Maja Chloupková, An-Sheng Zhang, Caroline A Enns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cells, molecules & diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular Functions of Ceruloplasmin in Metabolic Disease Pathology.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A computational model of liver iron metabolism.PLoS computational biology · 2013
    Article
  9. ER Stress and Iron Homeostasis: A New Frontier for the UPR.Biochemistry research international · 2011
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maja ChloupkováDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code L215, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
An-Sheng Zhang
Caroline A Enns
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Function of the hemochromatosis proteinR37DK054488 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ENNS, CAROLINE · 2010 to 2019
$4.0M
Regulation and function of transferrin receptor 2R01DK072166 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ENNS, CAROLINE · 2005 to 2017
$3.7M
FUNCTION OF THE HEMOCHROMATOSIS PROTEINR01DK054488 · NIDDK · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ENNS, CAROLINE · 2000 to 2009
$3.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK072166NIDDK NIH HHS DK54488NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK054488NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072166NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK054488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in either the hereditary hemochromatosis protein, HFE, or transferrin receptor 2, TfR2, result in a similarly severe form of the most common type of iron overload disease called hereditary hemochromatosis. Models of the interactions between HFE, TfR1, and TfR2 imply that these proteins are present in different molar concentrations in the liver, where they control expression of the iron regulatory hormone, hepcidin, in response to body iron loading. The aim of this study was to determine in vivo levels of mRNA by quantitative RT-PCR and concentrations of these proteins by quantitative immunoblotting in human liver tissues. The level of TfR2 mRNA was 21- and 63-fold higher than that of TfR1 and HFE, respectively. Molar concentration of TfR2 protein was the highest and determined to be 1.95 nmol/g protein in whole cell lysates and 10.89 nmol/g protein in microsomal membranes. Molar concentration of TfR1 protein was 4.5- and 6.1-fold lower than that of TfR2 in whole cell lysates and membranes, respectively. The level of HFE protein was below 0.53 nmol/g of total protein. HFE is thus present in substoichiometric concentrations with respect to both TfR1 and TfR2 in human liver tissue. This finding supports a model, in which availability of HFE is limiting for formation of complexes with TfR1 or TfR2.

Indexed as

Antigens, CDCell LineHemochromatosis ProteinHep G2 CellsHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHumansImmunoblottingImmunoprecipitationLiverMembrane ProteinsMicrosomes, LiverProtein BindingReceptors, TransferrinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerAntigens, CDCD71 antigenHemochromatosis ProteinHFE protein, humanHistocompatibility Antigens Class IMembrane ProteinsReceptors, TransferrinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsRNA, MessengerTFR2 protein, humanTransferrin

Identifiers

PMID19819738
PMCPMC2818201
OpenAlexW2055435641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.