ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2009
Management of intracranial pressure.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extensive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Involving Basal Ganglia and Frontal Lobe With Intraventricular and Subarachnoid Extension in a Triplet Pregnancy Following In Vitro Fertilization: A Case Report and Review.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Passive head-up tilt positioning as an early mobilization strategy in neurocritical care: a prospective-retrospective controlled study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Article
- Complications of Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy: Risk Factors of Complications and Comparison Between Autogenous and Artificial Bones.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2022Article
- Cerebral Hemorrhage: Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Future Directions.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Validity and reliability of pocket-sized ultrasound devices in measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter in ICU patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Observational
- Posture systematically alters ear-canal reflectance and DPOAE properties.Hearing research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although intracranial hypertension may arise from diverse pathology, several basic principles remain paramount to understanding its dynamics; however, the management of elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) may be very complex. Initial management of common ICP exacerbants is important, such as addressing venous outflow obstruction with upright midline head positioning and treating agitation and pain with sedation and analgesia. Surgical decompression of mass effect may rapidly improve ICP elevation, but the impact on outcome is unclear. Considerable effort has been put forth to understand the roles of multimodal intensive care monitoring, osmolar therapy, cerebral metabolic suppression, and temperature augmentation in the advanced management of elevated ICP. Establishing a protocol-driven approach to the management of ICP enables the rapid bedside assessment of multiple physiologic variables to implement appropriate treatments, which limit the risk of developing secondary brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.