Correction: Expected values for pedometer-determined physical activity in older populations.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Greater physical activity is associated with better cognitive function in heart failure.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2014
   Article
2. How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2011
   Review
3. The Relationship Between Pedometer-Determined Ambulatory Activity and Balance Variables Within an Older Adult Population.Gerontology & geriatric medicine
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Erratum for
  Expected values for pedometer-determined physical activity in older populations.2009

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract