ArticleMolecular diversity2010
Prediction of interactiveness of proteins and nucleic acids based on feature selections.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying DNA-binding proteins by combining support vector machine and PSSM distance transformation.BMC systems biology · 2015Article
- The role of electrostatic energy in prediction of obligate protein-protein interactions.Proteome science · 2013Article
- An improved sequence based prediction protocol for DNA-binding proteins using SVM and comprehensive feature analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- Prediction of substrate-enzyme-product interaction based on molecular descriptors and physicochemical properties.BioMed research international · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is important to identify which proteins can interact with nucleic acids for the purpose of protein annotation, since interactions between nucleic acids and proteins involve in numerous cellular processes such as replication, transcription, splicing, and DNA repair. This research tries to identify proteins that can interact with DNA, RNA, and rRNA, respectively. mRMR (Minimum redundancy and maximum relevance), with its elegant mathematical formulation, has been applied widely in processing biological data and feature analysis since its introduction in 2005. mRMR plus incremental feature selection (IFS) is known to be very efficient in feature selection and analysis, and able to improve both effectiveness and efficiency of a prediction model. IFS is applied to decide how many features should be selected from feature list provided by mRMR. In the end, the selected features of mRMR and IFS are further refined by a conventional feature selection method--forward feature wrapper (FFW), by reordering the features. Each protein is coded by 132 features including amino acid compositions and physicochemical properties. After the feature selection, k-Nearest Neighbor algorithm, the adopted prediction model, is trained and tested. As a result, the optimized prediction accuracies for the DNA, RNA, and rRNA are 82.0, 83.4, and 92.3%, respectively. Furthermore, the most important features that contribute to the prediction are identified and analyzed biologically. The predictor, developed for this research, is available for public access at http://chemdata.shu.edu.cn/protein_na_mrmr/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19816781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.