Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19816668›Full record

ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2009

[Surviving multiple trauma--what comes next? The rehabilitation of seriously injured patients].

S Simmel, V Bühren

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Physical functionality two years after major trauma: predictors from a single center cohort study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Sequelae of severe injuries : consequences for trauma rehabilitation].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2013
    Review
  10. Outcome after severe multiple trauma: a retrospective analysis.Journal of trauma management & outcomes · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S SimmelAbteilung für BG-Rehabilitation, BG-Unfallklinik Murnau, Professor-Küntscher-Str. 8, 82418 Murnau. stefan.simmel@bgu-murnau.de
V Bühren

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The survival chances of multiple trauma patients have improved continuously over the last decades. Therefore, not only the question of whether the patient survives a serious accident arises, but rather how the patient survives it. The after effects of trauma are seen not only physically, but also psychologically and socially. These affect quality of life and are evident years after the accident. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a system to classify the after effects of trauma, which can be measured with the help of assessment instruments. Knowing which parameters can influence trauma after effects is essential for the planning, organization, and implementation of a rehabilitation programme following severe injury. The requirements of an optimal rehabilitation process place high demands on the rehabilitation facility and on the rehabilitation team, which ultimately can only be fulfilled by specialized facilities.

Indexed as

Patient Care TeamAdultCombined Modality TherapyDepressive DisorderDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMultiple TraumaPrognosisQuality of LifeRehabilitation CentersSocial AdjustmentStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticSurvival Rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.