Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19816556›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2009

Structure-based predictive models for allosteric hot spots.

Omar N A Demerdash, Michael D Daily, Julie C Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Discovery of a HiddenACS omega · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Engineering an Allosteric Control of Protein Function.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021
    Review
  5. Functional plasticity and evolutionary adaptation of allosteric regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Computational Methods for Predicting Functions at the mRNA Isoform Level.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. A review of mathematical representations of biomolecular data.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Omar N A DemerdashBiophysics Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Michael D Daily
Julie C Mitchell

Funding

INTEGRATED TRAINING FOR PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTST32GM008692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E · 1998 to 2020
$10.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In allostery, a binding event at one site in a protein modulates the behavior of a distant site. Identifying residues that relay the signal between sites remains a challenge. We have developed predictive models using support-vector machines, a widely used machine-learning method. The training data set consisted of residues classified as either hotspots or non-hotspots based on experimental characterization of point mutations from a diverse set of allosteric proteins. Each residue had an associated set of calculated features. Two sets of features were used, one consisting of dynamical, structural, network, and informatic measures, and another of structural measures defined by Daily and Gray. The resulting models performed well on an independent data set consisting of hotspots and non-hotspots from five allosteric proteins. For the independent data set, our top 10 models using Feature Set 1 recalled 68-81% of known hotspots, and among total hotspot predictions, 58-67% were actual hotspots. Hence, these models have precision P = 58-67% and recall R = 68-81%. The corresponding models for Feature Set 2 had P = 55-59% and R = 81-92%. We combined the features from each set that produced models with optimal predictive performance. The top 10 models using this hybrid feature set had R = 73-81% and P = 64-71%, the best overall performance of any of the sets of models. Our methods identified hotspots in structural regions of known allosteric significance. Moreover, our predicted hotspots form a network of contiguous residues in the interior of the structures, in agreement with previous work. In conclusion, we have developed models that discriminate between known allosteric hotspots and non-hotspots with high accuracy and sensitivity. Moreover, the pattern of predicted hotspots corresponds to known functional motifs implicated in allostery, and is consistent with previous work describing sparse networks of allosterically important residues.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalStructure-Activity RelationshipAlgorithmsAllosteric SiteArtificial IntelligenceCluster AnalysisLac RepressorsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSignal TransductionThermodynamicsTranscription FactorsLac RepressorsProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID19816556
PMCPMC2748687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.