ArticlePLoS computational biology2009
Structure-based predictive models for allosteric hot spots.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery of a HiddenACS omega · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Engineering an Allosteric Control of Protein Function.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2021Review
- Functional plasticity and evolutionary adaptation of allosteric regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Computational Methods for Predicting Functions at the mRNA Isoform Level.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Mapping allosteric communications within individual proteins.Nature communications · 2020Article
- A review of mathematical representations of biomolecular data.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020Review
- A topology-based network tree for the prediction of protein-protein binding affinity changes following mutation.Nature machine intelligence · 2020Article
- Representability of algebraic topology for biomolecules in machine learning based scoring and virtual screening.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Are there physicochemical differences between allosteric and competitive ligands?PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- TopologyNet: Topology based deep convolutional and multi-task neural networks for biomolecular property predictions.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Prediction of allosteric sites and mediating interactions through bond-to-bond propensities.Nature communications · 2016Article
- Dissecting Dynamic Allosteric Pathways Using Chemically Related Small-Molecule Activators.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2016Article
- Solution NMR Spectroscopy for the Study of Enzyme Allostery.Chemical reviews · 2016Review
- Rigid Residue Scan Simulations Systematically Reveal Residue Entropic Roles in Protein Allostery.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- CryptoSite: Expanding the Druggable Proteome by Characterization and Prediction of Cryptic Binding Sites.Journal of molecular biology · 2016Article
- Common Internal Allosteric Network Links Anesthetic Binding Sites in a Pentameric Ligand-Gated Ion Channel.PloS one · 2016Article
- Dynamic profile analysis to characterize dynamics-driven allosteric sites in enzymes.Biophysics and physicobiology · 2016Article
- AlloPred: prediction of allosteric pockets on proteins using normal mode perturbation analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In allostery, a binding event at one site in a protein modulates the behavior of a distant site. Identifying residues that relay the signal between sites remains a challenge. We have developed predictive models using support-vector machines, a widely used machine-learning method. The training data set consisted of residues classified as either hotspots or non-hotspots based on experimental characterization of point mutations from a diverse set of allosteric proteins. Each residue had an associated set of calculated features. Two sets of features were used, one consisting of dynamical, structural, network, and informatic measures, and another of structural measures defined by Daily and Gray. The resulting models performed well on an independent data set consisting of hotspots and non-hotspots from five allosteric proteins. For the independent data set, our top 10 models using Feature Set 1 recalled 68-81% of known hotspots, and among total hotspot predictions, 58-67% were actual hotspots. Hence, these models have precision P = 58-67% and recall R = 68-81%. The corresponding models for Feature Set 2 had P = 55-59% and R = 81-92%. We combined the features from each set that produced models with optimal predictive performance. The top 10 models using this hybrid feature set had R = 73-81% and P = 64-71%, the best overall performance of any of the sets of models. Our methods identified hotspots in structural regions of known allosteric significance. Moreover, our predicted hotspots form a network of contiguous residues in the interior of the structures, in agreement with previous work. In conclusion, we have developed models that discriminate between known allosteric hotspots and non-hotspots with high accuracy and sensitivity. Moreover, the pattern of predicted hotspots corresponds to known functional motifs implicated in allostery, and is consistent with previous work describing sparse networks of allosterically important residues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.