Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19814915›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2009

An update on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction with and without asthma.

Chris Randolph

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Water-based exercise for adults with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Vitamins C and E for asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Asthma management in New York City schools: A physical education teacher perspective.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019
    Article
  5. Pathophysiology of bronchoconstriction: role of oxidatively damaged DNA repair.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2016
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A rat model of exercise-induced asthma: a nonspecific response to a specific immunogen.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chris RandolphCenter for Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Yale University Affiliated Programs, 1389 West Main Street, Suite 205, Waterbury, CT 06708, USA. ccrandmd@aol.com
Center for Asthma, Allergy and Respiratory Disease · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is defined as transient, reversible bronchoconstriction that develops after strenuous exercise. It is a heterogeneous syndrome made up of a spectrum of phenotypes ranging from the asymptomatic military recruit whose condition is detected by diagnostic exercise challenge to the athlete with known asthma to the elite athlete for whom EIB represents an overuse or injury syndrome. If exercise is the only identified trigger for bronchoconstriction, it is called EIB. However, when it is associated with known asthma, then it is defined as EIB with asthma. This review discusses the pathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis, and management of EIB and EIB with asthma.

Indexed as

Asthma, Exercise-InducedBronchiBronchodilator AgentsConstriction, PathologicExerciseHumansRisk FactorsBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID19814915
OpenAlexW2000411020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.