ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2009
Information management to enable personalized medicine: stakeholder roles in building clinical decision support.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Genetically guided precision medicine clinical decision support tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Pooled it
- Clinical decision support for genetically guided personalized medicine: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAPooled it
- Long-Term Monitoring of Individuals With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using Digital Health Technology: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Using shared clinical decision support to reduce adverse drug events and improve patient safety.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- A nationwide cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia for the assessment of understanding and practices of clinicians towards personalized genetic testing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- An Implementation Science Framework to Develop a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Familial Hypercholesterolemia.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Clinical Genome Data Model (cGDM) provides Interactive Clinical Decision Support for Precision Medicine.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Using EHRs to advance epilepsy care.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2019Article
- How does the knowledge environment shape procurement practices for orthopaedic medical devices in Mexico?BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2016Article
- Designing an Electronic Patient Management System for Multiple Sclerosis: Building a Next Generation Multiple Sclerosis Documentation System.Interactive journal of medical research · 2016Article
- Feasibility of using algorithm-based clinical decision support for symptom assessment and management in lung cancer.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2015Article
- A proposed clinical decision support architecture capable of supporting whole genome sequence information.Journal of personalized medicine · 2014Article
- Formative evaluation of clinician experience with integrating family history-based clinical decision support into clinical practice.Journal of personalized medicine · 2014Article
- Bioinformatics for precision medicine in oncology: principles and application to the SHIVA clinical trial.Frontiers in genetics · 2014Review
- Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2013Review
- Electronic medical records and personalized medicine.Human genetics · 2011Article
- Biomedical informatics and translational medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2010Review
- Translational informatics: an industry perspective.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in technology and the scientific understanding of disease processes are presenting new opportunities to improve health through individualized approaches to patient management referred to as personalized medicine. Future health care strategies that deploy genomic technologies and molecular therapies will bring opportunities to prevent, predict, and pre-empt disease processes but will be dependent on knowledge management capabilities for health care providers that are not currently available. A key cornerstone to the potential application of this knowledge will be effective use of electronic health records. In particular, appropriate clinical use of genomic test results and molecularly-targeted therapies present important challenges in patient management that can be effectively addressed using electronic clinical decision support technologies. DISCUSSION: Approaches to shaping future health information needs for personalized medicine were undertaken by a work group of the American Health Information Community. A needs assessment for clinical decision support in electronic health record systems to support personalized medical practices was conducted to guide health future development activities. Further, a suggested action plan was developed for government, researchers and research institutions, developers of electronic information tools (including clinical guidelines, and quality measures), and standards development organizations to meet the needs for personalized approaches to medical practice. In this article, we focus these activities on stakeholder organizations as an operational framework to help identify and coordinate needs and opportunities for clinical decision support tools to enable personalized medicine. SUMMARY: This perspective addresses conceptual approaches that can be undertaken to develop and apply clinical decision support in electronic health record systems to achieve personalized medical care. In addition, to represent meaningful benefits to personalized decision-making, a comparison of current and future applications of clinical decision support to enable individualized medical treatment plans is presented. If clinical decision support tools are to impact outcomes in a clear and positive manner, their development and deployment must therefore consider the needs of the providers, including specific practice needs, information workflow, and practice environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.