Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19814812›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2009

Text mining and manual curation of chemical-gene-disease networks for the comparative toxicogenomics database (CTD).

Thomas C Wiegers, Allan Peter Davis, K Bretonnel Cohen, Lynette Hirschman, Carolyn J Mattingly

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Research in pharmaceutical sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Overview of the BioCreative VI text-mining services for Kinome Curation Track.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas C WiegersDepartment of Bioinformatics, The Mount Desert Island Biological Laboratory, Salisbury Cove, ME, USA. twiegers@mdibl.org
Allan Peter Davis
K Bretonnel Cohen
Lynette Hirschman
Carolyn J Mattingly

Funding

WNT SIGNALING IN THE DEVELOPING GASTROINTESTINAL TRACTP20RR016463 · NCRR · MOUNT DESERT ISLAND BIOLOGICAL LAB · PI WRAY, CHRISTOPHER C · 2001 to 2011
$41.0M
The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)R01ES014065 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI DAVIS, ALLAN PETER, MATTINGLY, CAROLYN J. · 2006 to 2021
$10.5M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR-016463NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016463NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) is a publicly available resource that promotes understanding about the etiology of environmental diseases. It provides manually curated chemical-gene/protein interactions and chemical- and gene-disease relationships from the peer-reviewed, published literature. The goals of the research reported here were to establish a baseline analysis of current CTD curation, develop a text-mining prototype from readily available open source components, and evaluate its potential value in augmenting curation efficiency and increasing data coverage.

resultsPrototype text-mining applications were developed and evaluated using a CTD data set consisting of manually curated molecular interactions and relationships from 1,600 documents. Preliminary results indicated that the prototype found 80% of the gene, chemical, and disease terms appearing in curated interactions. These terms were used to re-rank documents for curation, resulting in increases in mean average precision (63% for the baseline vs. 73% for a rule-based re-ranking), and in the correlation coefficient of rank vs. number of curatable interactions per document (baseline 0.14 vs. 0.38 for the rule-based re-ranking).

conclusionThis text-mining project is unique in its integration of existing tools into a single workflow with direct application to CTD. We performed a baseline assessment of the inter-curator consistency and coverage in CTD, which allowed us to measure the potential of these integrated tools to improve prioritization of journal articles for manual curation. Our study presents a feasible and cost-effective approach for developing a text mining solution to enhance manual curation throughput and efficiency.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualGene Regulatory NetworksToxicogeneticsComputational BiologyInformation Storage and Retrieval

Identifiers

PMID19814812
PMCPMC2768719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.