Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19814793›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2009

Electrical muscle stimulation preserves the muscle mass of critically ill patients: a randomized study.

Vasiliki Gerovasili, Konstantinos Stefanidis, Konstantinos Vitzilaios, Eleftherios Karatzanos, Panagiotis Politis, Apostolos Koroneos, Aikaterini Chatzimichail, Christina Routsi, Charis Roussos, Serafim Nanas

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 115 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00882830 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Electrical Muscle Stimulation (EMS), a Preventive and Therapeutic Tool for Critical Illness Polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM)- A Randomized Controlled Parallel Intervention Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AthensRan2007 to 2015Enrolled52ConditionsCritical Illness Polyneuromyopathy (CIPNM), ICU Acquired Weakness (ICUAW)ArmsEMS
NCT02391103 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Muscle Mass and Strength in Critically Ill Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery. An Ultrasound-Based Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical University of ViennaRan2011 to 2015Enrolled54ConditionsNeuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness, Muscle Wasting, Muscle LossArmsCompex 3 Professional (CefarCompex Medical AB) stimulator, sham-stimulation
NCT03406494 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Southern Medical University Clinical Research Project Initiative:Efficacy and Safety of a Multicomponent Physical Therapy Program in Mechanically Ventilated Patient With Sepsis

TypeinterventionalSponsorZhujiang HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled800ConditionsSepsisArmsEarly multicomponent physical therapy program
NCT05474157 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Sarcopenia and Related Factors in COVID-19 Following Intensive Care

TypeobservationalSponsorKoç UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsSarcopenia, Covid19, Intensive Care Unit Acquired WeaknessArmsStandard care treatment for COVID-19 in Intensive Care Unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 368 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. The efficacy and prescription of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Physical rehabilitation for critical illness myopathy and neuropathy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vasiliki GerovasiliFirst Critical Care Department, Evangelismos Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 45-47 Ypsilantou Str, 106 75 Athens, Greece. gerovasili_v@yahoo.com
Konstantinos Stefanidis
Konstantinos Vitzilaios
Eleftherios Karatzanos
Panagiotis Politis
Apostolos Koroneos
Aikaterini Chatzimichail
Christina Routsi
Charis Roussos
Serafim Nanas
Evangelismos Hospital · GRNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCritically ill patients are characterized by increased loss of muscle mass, partially attributed to sepsis and multiple organ failure, as well as immobilization. Recent studies have shown that electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) may be an alternative to active exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with myopathy. The aim of our study was to investigate the EMS effects on muscle mass preservation of critically ill patients with the use of ultrasonography (US).

methodsForty-nine critically ill patients (age: 59 +/- 21 years) with an APACHE II admission score >or=13 were randomly assigned after stratification upon admission to receive daily EMS sessions of both lower extremities (EMS-group) or to the control group (control group). Muscle mass was evaluated with US, by measuring the cross sectional diameter (CSD) of the vastus intermedius and the rectus femoris of the quadriceps muscle.

resultsTwenty-six patients were finally evaluated. Right rectus femoris and right vastus intermedius CSD decreased in both groups (EMS group: from 1.42 +/- 0.48 to 1.31 +/- 0.45 cm, P = 0.001 control group: from 1.59 +/- 0.53 to 1.37 +/- 0.5 cm, P = 0.002; EMS group: from 0.91 +/- 0.39 to 0.81 +/- 0.38 cm, P = 0.001 control group: from 1.40 +/- 0.64 to 1.11 +/- 0.56 cm, P = 0.004, respectively). However, the CSD of the right rectus femoris decreased significantly less in the EMS group (-0.11 +/- 0.06 cm, -8 +/- 3.9%) as compared to the control group (-0.21 +/- 0.10 cm, -13.9 +/- 6.4%; P < 0.05) and the CSD of the right vastus intermedius decreased significantly less in the EMS group (-0.10 +/- 0.05 cm, -12.5 +/- 7.4%) as compared to the control group (-0.29 +/- 0.28 cm, -21.5 +/- 15.3%; P < 0.05).

conclusionsEMS is well tolerated and seems to preserve the muscle mass of critically ill patients. The potential use of EMS as a preventive and rehabilitation tool in ICU patients with polyneuromyopathy needs to be further investigated.

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov: NCT00882830.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessElectric StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overAPACHEFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalMuscular AtrophyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID19814793
PMCPMC2784391
OpenAlexW2141500947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.