ArticleEvolutionary bioinformatics online2009
Initial implementation of a comparative data analysis ontology.
Article in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- BioHackathon 2015: Semantics of data for life sciences and reproducible research.F1000Research · 2020Article
- The Orthology Ontology: development and applications.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2016Article
- Evolutionary relationships among barley and Arabidopsis core circadian clock and clock-associated genes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2015Article
- Big data and other challenges in the quest for orthologs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2014Article
- A semantic model for species description applied to the ensign wasps (hymenoptera: evaniidae) of New Caledonia.Systematic biology · 2013Article
- EDAM: an ontology of bioinformatics operations, types of data and identifiers, topics and formats.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
- Phylotastic! Making tree-of-life knowledge accessible, reusable and convenient.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- The 3rd DBCLS BioHackathon: improving life science data integration with Semantic Web technologies.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2013Article
- Advancing data reuse in phyloinformatics using an ontology-driven Semantic Web approach.BMC medical genomics · 2013Article
- Bio.Phylo: a unified toolkit for processing, analyzing and visualizing phylogenetic trees in Biopython.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- NeXML: rich, extensible, and verifiable representation of comparative data and metadata.Systematic biology · 2012Article
- CDAO-store: ontology-driven data integration for phylogenetic analysis.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- BIO::Phylo-phyloinformatic analysis using perl.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Next generation models for storage and representation of microbial biological annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2010Article
- Phenex: ontological annotation of phenotypic diversity.PloS one · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comparative analysis is used throughout biology. When entities under comparison (e.g. proteins, genomes, species) are related by descent, evolutionary theory provides a framework that, in principle, allows N-ary comparisons of entities, while controlling for non-independence due to relatedness. Powerful software tools exist for specialized applications of this approach, yet it remains under-utilized in the absence of a unifying informatics infrastructure. A key step in developing such an infrastructure is the definition of a formal ontology. The analysis of use cases and existing formalisms suggests that a significant component of evolutionary analysis involves a core problem of inferring a character history, relying on key concepts: "Operational Taxonomic Units" (OTUs), representing the entities to be compared; "character-state data" representing the observations compared among OTUs; "phylogenetic tree", representing the historical path of evolution among the entities; and "transitions", the inferred evolutionary changes in states of characters that account for observations. Using the Web Ontology Language (OWL), we have defined these and other fundamental concepts in a Comparative Data Analysis Ontology (CDAO). CDAO has been evaluated for its ability to represent token data sets and to support simple forms of reasoning. With further development, CDAO will provide a basis for tools (for semantic transformation, data retrieval, validation, integration, etc.) that make it easier for software developers and biomedical researchers to apply evolutionary methods of inference to diverse types of data, so as to integrate this powerful framework for reasoning into their research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.