Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19812698›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Population structure of humpback whales from their breeding grounds in the South Atlantic and Indian Oceans.

Howard C Rosenbaum, Cristina Pomilla, Martin Mendez, Matthew S Leslie, Peter B Best, Ken P Findlay, Gianna Minton, Peter J Ersts, Timothy Collins, Marcia H Engel and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Howard C RosenbaumCetacean Conservation and Research Program, Global Conservation-Marine, Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, United States of America. hrosenbaum@wcs.org
Cristina Pomilla
Martin Mendez
Matthew S Leslie
Peter B Best
Ken P Findlay
Gianna Minton
Peter J Ersts
Timothy Collins
Marcia H Engel
Sandro L Bonatto
Deon P G H Kotze
Mike Meÿer
Jaco Barendse
Meredith Thornton
Yvette Razafindrakoto
Solange Ngouessono
Michel Vely
Jeremy Kiszka
Wildlife Conservation Society · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZAAssociation Francaise contre les Myopathies · FRColumbia University · USFundação Instituto de Pesca do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRLa Rochelle Université · FRMadagascar Biodiversity Partnership · MGNational Agency for National Parks · GAPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although humpback whales are among the best-studied of the large whales, population boundaries in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) have remained largely untested. We assess population structure of SH humpback whales using 1,527 samples collected from whales at fourteen sampling sites within the Southwestern and Southeastern Atlantic, the Southwestern Indian Ocean, and Northern Indian Ocean (Breeding Stocks A, B, C and X, respectively). Evaluation of mtDNA population structure and migration rates was carried out under different statistical frameworks. Using all genetic evidence, the results suggest significant degrees of population structure between all ocean basins, with the Southwestern and Northern Indian Ocean most differentiated from each other. Effective migration rates were highest between the Southeastern Atlantic and the Southwestern Indian Ocean, followed by rates within the Southeastern Atlantic, and the lowest between the Southwestern and Northern Indian Ocean. At finer scales, very low gene flow was detected between the two neighbouring sub-regions in the Southeastern Atlantic, compared to high gene flow for whales within the Southwestern Indian Ocean. Our genetic results support the current management designations proposed by the International Whaling Commission of Breeding Stocks A, B, C, and X as four strongly structured populations. The population structure patterns found in this study are likely to have been influenced by a combination of long-term maternally directed fidelity of migratory destinations, along with other ecological and oceanographic features in the region.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationAnimalsAtlantic OceanDNA, MitochondrialEcologyFemaleGenetics, PopulationHaplotypesHumpback WhaleIndian OceanMaleModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticSexual Behavior, AnimalDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID19812698
PMCPMC2754530
OpenAlexW2127026096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.