Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19812306›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2009

Biogenesis of tail-anchored proteins: the beginning for the end?

Catherine Rabu, Volker Schmid, Blanche Schwappach, Stephen High

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The roles of cytosolic quality control proteins, SGTA and the BAG6 complex, in disease.Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Catherine RabuFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK.
Volker Schmid
Blanche Schwappach
Stephen High
University of Manchester · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D007879/1Wellcome Trust 081671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tail-anchored proteins are a distinct class of integral membrane proteins located in several eukaryotic organelles, where they perform a diverse range of functions. These proteins have in common the C-terminal location of their transmembrane anchor and the resulting post-translational nature of their membrane insertion, which, unlike the co-translational membrane insertion of most other proteins, is not coupled to ongoing protein synthesis. The study of tail-anchored proteins has provided a paradigm for understanding the components and pathways that mediate post-translational biogenesis of membrane proteins at the endoplasmic reticulum. In this Commentary, we review recent studies that have converged at a consensus regarding the molecular mechanisms that underlie this process--namely, that multiple pathways underlie the biogenesis of tail-anchored proteins at the endoplasmic reticulum.

Indexed as

AnimalsEndoplasmic ReticulumGolgi ApparatusHeat-Shock ProteinsHumansMembrane ProteinsProtein TransportSignal Recognition ParticleHeat-Shock ProteinsMembrane ProteinsSignal Recognition Particle

Identifiers

PMID19812306
PMCPMC2758799
OpenAlexW2132545929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.