Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19811354›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993)2009

Effect of high fat loading in Dahl salt-sensitive rats.

Ai Nagae, Megumi Fujita, Hiroo Kawarazaki, Hiromitu Matsui, Katsuyuki Ando, Toshiro Fujita

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Rat Models of Metabolic Syndrome.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Cutting the Fat.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ai NagaeDepartment of Nephrology and Endocrinology, University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Megumi Fujita
Hiroo Kawarazaki
Hiromitu Matsui
Katsuyuki Ando
Toshiro Fujita
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salt sensitivity of blood pressure (BP) is speculated to be a characteristic in obesity-induced hypertension. To elucidate the influence of obesity on salt-sensitive hypertension, we examined the effect of fat loading on BP, renal damage, and their progression induced by salt excess in Dahl salt-sensitive (S) rats. High fat (HF: 45% fat diet: 8 weeks) diet increased BP with greater weight gain and visceral fat accumulation than low fat (10% fat) diet. In HF-fed rats, plasma glucose, plasma insulin, and urinary catecholamine increased, and urinary protein tended to be elevated. Moreover, excessive salt (8% salt diet: 8 weeks)-induced hypertension and proteinuria was accelerated in HF-fed rats. Therefore, fat loading increased BP in Dahl S rats possibly through insulin-resistance and sympathetic excitation. Moreover, fat loading accelerated salt-induced BP elevation and renal damage, suggesting excessive intake of both fat and salt, such as a civilized diet, exert the synergic harmful effects.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood GlucoseBlood PressureCatecholaminesDietary FatsDisease Models, AnimalDisease ProgressionHypertensionInsulinIntra-Abdominal FatKidneyMaleObesityRatsRats, Inbred DahlSodium Chloride, DietaryBlood GlucoseCatecholaminesDietary FatsInsulinSodium Chloride, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID19811354
PMCPMC2730819
OpenAlexW2029490049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.