Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19810779›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2009

Effectiveness of safety warnings in atypical antipsychotic drugs: an interrupted time-series analysis in Spain.

Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno, Pedro Cervera-Casino, Salvador Peiró, Beatriz González López-Valcarcel, Amparo Blázquez, Teresa Barbera

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Trends in use of antipsychotics in elderly patients with dementia: Impact of national safety warnings.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriel Sanfélix-GimenoCentro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública (CSISP), Conselleria de Sanitat, Valencia, Spain.
Pedro Cervera-Casino
Salvador Peiró
Beatriz González López-Valcarcel
Amparo Blázquez
Teresa Barbera
Conselleria de Sanitat Universal i Salut Pública · ESDepartamento de Salud · ESUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies conducted to obtain drug authorization are often of short duration and based on small sample sizes in selected populations. Policies on drug safety rely on the validity of the methods used to achieve rapid and effective communication of new information. No formal evaluation has ever been made of the Spanish communications system, although indirect data have raised questions about its effectiveness.

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of two safety warnings issued by the Spanish Drug Agency, and of a later prior authorization requirement involving the use of atypical antipsychotic drugs in the elderly.

methodsThe study was based on a time-series analysis constructed with data corresponding to monthly invoicing from 2000 to 2006 for olanzapine and risperidone in the Region of Valencia, Spain. Because the safety warnings and the prior authorization policy applied exclusively to prescriptions of these drugs for elderly patients with dementia, we investigated whether these interventions were successful and therefore changed prescription patterns for pensioners receiving low-strength formulations (the available proxy for elderly subjects with dementia), without altering patterns for those receiving the highest-strength formulations (typically used in schizophrenic patients) or for prescriptions for non-pensioners (any strength formulations). These two latter groups were therefore established as the control groups.

resultsDefined daily doses (DDDs) for olanzapine in low-strength pharmaceutical forms showed a clear levelling off after the first warning, while that for risperidone showed less pronounced decline. The prior authorization policy had a dramatic effect on the consumption of risperidone, but not on that of olanzapine. DDDs for low-strength formulations between the 12 months prior to the first warning and the 12 months following the prior authorization showed a substantial reduction (22% for risperidone and 33% for olanzapine). In the high-strength forms and in non-pensioners the upward trends in DDDs remained unaltered after both interventions.

conclusionThe safety warnings concerning atypical antipsychotic drugs were effective in reducing the prescribing of risperidone and olanzapine in low-strength doses in pensioner prescriptions, and the implementation of a prior authorization policy had a dramatic effect on the prescribing of risperidone.

Indexed as

AgedAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesDementiaDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug and Narcotic ControlHumansInformation DisseminationOlanzapinePractice Patterns, Physicians'RisperidoneSpainAntipsychotic AgentsBenzodiazepinesOlanzapineRisperidone

Identifiers

PMID19810779
OpenAlexW173231826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.