Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19808146›Full record

ArticleClinical therapeutics2009

Pattern and predictors of the initiation of biologic agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States: an analysis using a large observational data bank.

Esi Morgan DeWitt, Li Lin, Henry A Glick, Kevin J Anstrom, Kevin A Schulman, Shelby D Reed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical therapeutics, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Esi Morgan DeWittDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Rheumatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Li Lin
Henry A Glick
Kevin J Anstrom
Kevin A Schulman
Shelby D Reed
Clinical Research Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Validating and Extending the PROMIS Sexual Function Measure for Clinical ResearchU01AR052186 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WEINFURT, KEVIN P · 2004 to 2013
$9.5M
NIAMS NIH HHS 5U01-AR-52186NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052186
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the initiation of biologic agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a large US observational cohort.

methodsSemiannual patient-reported data in the ARAMIS (Arthritis, Rheumatism and Aging Medical Information System) data bank from January 1998 to January 2006 were analyzed retrospectively using pooled logistic regression (with adjustment for center-level and temporal effects) to identify patient-, disease-, and treatment-related characteristics associated with the initiation of biologics for the treatment of RA.

resultsThe analysis included 1545 patients from 7 US centers. By 2006, 41.4% of 679 patients remaining in the sample had received biologics. Initiation of biologics was significantly associated with greater disability in the previous 6-month period (per 1-unit increase in Health Assessment Questionnaire score: odds ratio [OR] = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.22-1.72; P < 0.01) and treatment in the previous period with steroids (OR = 2.24; 95% CI, 1.76-2.85; P < 0.01) or nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (OR = 2.43; 95% CI, 1.71-3.46; P < 0.01). Two sociodemographic factors were significant predictors of decreased use of biologics: older age (per 10 years: OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.660.82; P < 0.01) and lower annual income (per $10,000 reduction: OR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-1.00; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences with respect to sex, race, employment status, comorbidity, previous NSAID use, or treatment center.

conclusionsDisease- and treatment-related factors were significant predictors of the initiation of biologics for RA. Independent of these factors, however, biologics were less often used in patients who were older and those with lower incomes. Use of biologics increased steadily over the period studied.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunologic FactorsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesAntirheumatic AgentsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID19808146
PMCPMC3518838
OpenAlexW2094210031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.